Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    SIPC Trustee takes first steps to thaw frozen customer securities accounts
    2011-11-07

    On November 4, 2011, the SIPC Trustee took his first steps toward transferring frozen customer securities accounts held by MF Global Inc. ("MFGI") when he announced that he will be accepting proposals for the transfer of all customer securities accounts of MFGI (the "Securities Accounts") to another member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. This action is in addition to the steps the Trustee took last week to transfer certain segregated commodities accounts from MFGI to other futures commission merchants.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Security (finance), Discovery, Commodity, Liquidation, Due diligence, Balance sheet, Subpoena, Non-disclosure agreement, Memorandum opinion, Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Elizabeth A. McGovern
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Showell v. Pusey, C.A. No. 3970-VGC (Del. Ch. Sept. 1, 2011) (Glasscock, V.C.)
    2011-09-07

    In this memorandum opinion, the Court of Chancery held that a retiring member of a limited liability company was entitled to his proportionate share of the liquidation value, rather than the going concern value, of the company.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Share (finance), Interest, Limited liability company, Accounting, Consent, Retirement, Proportionality (law), Memorandum opinion, Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
    When must a debtor pay prepetition vendor claims for goods received by a debtor within 20 days of the petition date under new Bankruptcy Code Section 503(b)(9)?
    2007-04-13

    The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (the “BAPCPA”) created an additional category of administrative expenses

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Consumer protection, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Default (finance), Prejudice, Memorandum opinion, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    White & Case
    Guidance for directors of financially troubled companies from Delaware Bankruptcy Court
    2008-09-03

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on May 30, 2008, issued a memorandum opinion in which it refused to dismiss claims of breach of fiduciary duty against directors and officers of a company who approved the sale of the company’s assets on the eve of its filing for bankruptcy protection. In issuing its opinion inIn re Bridgeport Holdings Inc., the court provided some guidelines for directors and officers, particularly during challenging economic times.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Market liquidity, Liquidation, Good faith, Duty of care, Business judgement rule, Line of credit, Valuation (finance), Leverage (finance), Memorandum opinion, Chief executive officer, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
    Special purpose entities – the new Chapter 11 debtors: General Growth bankruptcy court takes the “remoteness” out of bankruptcy structured financings
    2009-08-17

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Mortgage loan, Bad faith, Refinancing, Commercial mortgage-backed security, Memorandum opinion, Secured loan, MetLife, Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    NY decision dents special-purpose entity shield
    2009-10-15

    A fundamental component in the commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS") market is the lender's reliance that the loan is made to a "bankruptcy remote" special purpose entity ("SPE"). The loan documents and operating agreements relating to an SPE typically require that the SPE maintain separate existence and contain restrictions that limit the SPE's debt and ensure separateness.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Reed Smith LLP, Corporate governance, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, Maturity (finance), Bad faith, Refinancing, Default (finance), Commercial mortgage-backed security, Mortgage-backed security, Memorandum opinion, Secured loan, Credit crunch, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Scott M. Esterbrook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Court dismisses public pension fund's bankruptcy case
    2012-06-13

    In our May 24 entry on this topic, the Northern Mariana Islands Retirement Fund (the “Fund”) was battling numerous challenges to its Chapter 11 eligibility. The dispute revolved around whether the Fund, which provides benefits to government workers and retirees, was a “governmental unit” as defined by the Bankruptcy Code. In a decision from the bench on June 1st, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Robert Faris affirmed his May 29th tentative ruling that the Fund is a “governmental unit” and, as such, is ineligible for Chapter 11.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Mintz, Memorandum opinion
    Authors:
    William W. Kannel , Eric R. Blythe
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    When must a debtor pay prepetition vendor claims for goods received by a debtor within 20 days of the petition date under new Bankruptcy Code Section 503(b)(9)?
    2007-04-13

    The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (the “BAPCPA”) created an additional category of administrative expenses

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Consumer protection, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Default (finance), Prejudice, Memorandum opinion, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    White & Case LLP
    Special purpose entities – the new Chapter 11 debtors: General Growth bankruptcy court takes the “remoteness” out of bankruptcy structured financings
    2009-08-17

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Mortgage loan, Bad faith, Refinancing, Commercial mortgage-backed security, Memorandum opinion, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, MetLife, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Delaware bankruptcy court finds bonus plan was created in the ordinary course of business
    2012-07-14

    On July 9, 2012, Judge Peter J. Walsh of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware issued a memorandum opinion (the "Opinion"), in the Blitz U.S.A. bankruptcy proceeding addressing whether an employee bonus plan is a transaction made in the ordinary course of business under 11 U.S.C.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Memorandum opinion, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Current page 2
    • Page 3
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days