Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    New York Court of Appeals maintains status quo on imputation, in pari delicto defenses
    2011-04-06

    On October 21, 2010, the New York Court of Appeals (the Appeals Court), New York’s highest appellate court, addressed two appeals, and then issued an important ruling regarding the parameters of the affirmative defense of in pari delicto in suits against outside auditors, holding that the doctrines of in pari delicto and imputation are a complete bar to recovery when the corporate wrongdoer’s actions are imputed to the company.

    The Doctrines of In Pari Delicto and Imputation

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Fraud, Fiduciary, Interest, Misconduct, Negligence, Common law, Malpractice, KPMG
    Authors:
    Kristin E. Richner
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Thabault v. Chait: completing the Third Circuit's deepening insolvency trilogy
    2009-03-06

    When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Thabault v. Chait, 541 F.3d 512 (3d Cir. 2008), in September 2008, it was the most significant accounting malpractice decision of last year and perhaps the most significant damages case in the last 20 years. Why? Accounting malpractice cases are filled with pitfalls for unsuspecting plaintiffs. Moreover, accounting firms tend to settle cases in which the plaintiffs survive motions predicated on tried-and-true legal defenses and factual hurdles. The result is that few auditing malpractice cases are tried.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Professional Negligence, Jones Day, Shareholder, Audit, Federal Reporter, Accounting, Negligence, Remand (court procedure), Causation (law), Malpractice, New York State Insurance Department, Third Circuit, US District Court for District of New Jersey, Chief financial officer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Seller beware: yet another cautionary tale for distressed-debt traders
    2008-08-01

    Participants in the multibillion-dollar market for distressed claims and securities had ample reason to keep a watchful eye on developments in the bankruptcy courts during each of the last three years. Controversial rulings handed down in 2005 and 2006 by the bankruptcy court overseeing the chapter 11 cases of failed energy broker Enron Corporation and its affiliates had traders scrambling for cover due to the potential that acquired claims/debt could be equitably subordinated or even disallowed, based upon the seller’s misconduct.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Conflict of laws, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Debt, Writ, Subsidiary, Malpractice, Enron, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Insolvency exclusion bars coverage for allegations that actuarial services firm contributed to client's insolvency
    2011-04-01

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has held, under California law, that an insurer had no duty to defend an insured actuarial services firm in litigation alleging that the insured’s reserve reviews and rate level recommendations contributed to the insolvency of a medical malpractice self-insurance fund. Zurich Specialties London Limited v. Bickerstaff, Whatley, Ryan & Burkhalter, Inc., 2011 WL 1118463 (9th Cir. Mar. 28, 2011).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Causation (law), Actuary, Malpractice, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Current page 2
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days