Analyzing the inner workings of the elements required for the securities contract “safe harbor” protection under Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Court for the SDNY dismissed a complaint seeking to recover approximately US$1 billion in allegedly fraudulent transfers brought against various transferees as part of the Boston Generating Chapter 11 case.

For many companies facing financial stress, restructuring liabilities is the only way for their business to survive. Consensual restructuring, or voluntary workout, requires agreement from creditors to reorganise the company’s liabilities, and is typically implemented by agreement between the company and its creditors. Court-based restructuring processes, on the other hand, involve at least some degree of legal coercion of creditors to vary or release liabilities.

Two of the classic self-help remedies open to landlords for recovering commercial rent arrears have traditionally been forfeiture and Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR), but both of these have been restricted as a result of Government measures to support tenants during the coronavirus crisis. There is also a proposed ban on winding-up petitions for coronavirus-related debts, which is already being applied by the courts.

Amended CRAR Regulations

The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill (the Bill) is being accelerated through Parliament and will soon become the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (the Act).

The Act, intended to give extra support to companies in financial difficulty, is likely to come into effect during July 2020. An overview of the Act can be found in our previous article.

Last week, in Re a Company (Application to Restrain Advertisement) [2020] EWHC 1551 (Ch) the High Court restrained the advertisement of a winding up petition on grounds of the impending changes to insolvency legislation, which are intended to have a retrospective effect.

Summary

Die Vornahme von Zahlungen und die Vereinnahmung von Zahlungen auf einem debitorischen Bankkonto nach Insolvenzreife sowie das Nicht-Stellen eines Insolvenzantrags gehören zu den größten Haftungsrisiken für GmbH-Geschäftsführer in der Krise. Dies gilt umso mehr, als jedenfalls ältere D&O-Versicherungsbedingungen für Zahlungen nach Insolvenzreife keinen Versicherungsschutz gewährten (vgl.

Re Akkurate Ltd (in Liquidation) [2020] EWHC 1433 (Ch)

Back in November we reported on the case of Wallace v Wallace [2019] EWHC 2503 (Ch), where the Court grappled with the diverging authorities on the issue of whether section 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 has extra-territorial effect.

The issue recently came back before the Court in Re Akkurate Ltd (in Liquidation) [2020] EWHC 1433 (Ch).

What did the Court decide?

The Supreme Court of New South Wales has helpfully given guidance to the liquidators of the RCR Tomlinson Group on a number of unsettled questions that have challenged insolvency practitioners (particularly liquidators of construction companies) when assessing whether certain intangible rights and assets are circulating assets.

The questions include:

As a result of the legal amendments on German tenancy law that were passed in March 2020 in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, landlords are not allowed to terminate lease agreements for default of rental payments occurring in the period from April 1 to June 30, 2020, until June 30, 2022, if those defaults result from the COVID-19 pandemic.