Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Stay relief: what happens to “unreasonable” fees?
    2014-10-17

    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 804 Congress, L.L.C. (In re 804 Congress, L.L.C.), 756 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2014) –

    After an oversecured creditor obtained relief from the automatic stay and foreclosed on some property, the bankruptcy court asserted jurisdiction over disposition of the sale proceeds and denied in part the creditor’s claim for fees. The district court reversed and the case was appealed to the 5thCircuit.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Foreclosure, Wells Fargo, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Post-petition interest: not very predictable
    2014-08-22

    Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. SW Boston Hotel Venture, LLC (In re SW Boston Hotel Venture, LLC), 748 F.3d. 393 (1st Cir. 2014) –

    A senior mortgagee battled the debtor and a junior mortgagee over its entitlement to post-petition interest: If and when did it become oversecured and thus entitled to interest? Was it entitled to interest at the default rate? Should the interest be compounded?

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Debtor, Interest
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Mortgagees beware: stay relief does not mean you are home free
    2013-01-08

    Trauner v. State Bank & Trust Co. (In re Solid Rock Development Corp.), 481 B.R. 221 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2012) –

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Attorney's fee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Marshaling assets: variation on a theme
    2012-10-23

    Great Lakes Agri-Services, LLC v State Bank of Newberg (In re Enright), 474 B.R. 854 (Bankr. E.D. Wisc. 2012) –

    Steven Enright and his wife borrowed money from a bank to buy dairy cows and other improvements for the family dairy farm.  The bank loan was secured by assets of the Enrights, and also guaranteed by Steven’s parents, with the parents’ guarantee secured by a mortgage on the dairy farm itself (which was owned by the parents).

    Filed under:
    USA, Wisconsin, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Shareholder, Collateral (finance), Mortgage loan
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Automatic stay
    2012-08-23

    Hiraldo v. Banco Popular Depuerto Rico (In re Hiraldo), 471 B.R. 676 (D. P.R. 2012) –

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Mortgage loan
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Successor liability after a Section 363 sale - buyer beware
    2011-03-18

    Reprinted with permission from the March 18, 2011 issue of The Legal Intelligencer © 2010 ALM Media Properties, LLC. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. All rights reserved.

    Over the last couple of years, the predominant goal in many business bankruptcy proceedings has been the sale of substantially all of the estate's assets. Such bankruptcy sales are often favored by buyers under Section 363(f), which enables a "free and clear" transfer of the assets.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Injunction, Limited liability company, Liability (financial accounting), In rem jurisdiction, Title 11 of the US Code, Ford Motor Company, General Motors, The Legal Intelligencer, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Francis J. Lawall
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Tenth Circuit Affirms Order Allowing Discharge of Private Student Loans
    2020-09-04

    On August 31, 2020, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado’s holding that certain student loans not guaranteed by a governmental unit may be discharged in bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Tenth Circuit
    Authors:
    Ethan G. Ostroff
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Third Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Motion for Summary Judgment in FDCPA Case
    2019-10-28

    In a non-precedential ruling, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a district court decision to grant summary judgment in favor of a defendant that was sued for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Title 11 of the US Code, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1977 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    FERC Claims Concurrent Jurisdiction Over Wholesale Power Agreements in PG&E Bankruptcy Dispute
    2019-01-30

    In orders issued on January 25 and 28, 2019, FERC concluded that the Commission and the bankruptcy courts have concurrent jurisdiction to review and address the disposition of FERC-jurisdictional contracts sought to be rejected through bankruptcy and, therefore, a party to a FERC-jurisdictional wholesale power agreement must first obtain approval from both FERC and the bankruptcy court to modify the filed rate and reject the filed wholesale power contract, respectively. FERC made its determination in response to two separate petitions (“Petitions”) filed by NextEra Energy, Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Bankruptcy, Federal Power Act 1920 (USA), FERC, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Miles Kiger
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Unredeemed Gift Card Holders Denied Bankruptcy Priority Status
    2016-09-16

    The Legal Intelligencer

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper
    Authors:
    Francis J. Lawall
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 3253
    • Page 3254
    • Page 3255
    • Page 3256
    • Current page 3257
    • Page 3258
    • Page 3259
    • Page 3260
    • Page 3261
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days