Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Stay here – Second Circuit in Residential Capital holds automatic stay can be applied to non-debtors where action has an immediate adverse economic consequence for estate
    2013-08-21

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Mortgage-backed security, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Second Circuit, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Benjamin C. Wolf
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    When a hospital becomes a no standing zone
    2011-11-10

    Bottom Line:

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina in In re Barnwell County Hospital, No. 11-06207 (Bankr. D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2011) held that anad hoc community group of citizens formed for the purpose of attempting to keep the Barnwell County hospital open and operating in its current location (the “Community Group”) was not a party-in-interest in the hospital’s bankruptcy case and so lacked standing to challenge the debtor’s eligibility for relief under chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, South Carolina, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Standing (law), Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Enforceability of subordination provisions in synthetic CDOs — a Lehman perspective
    2010-02-03

    On January 25, 2010, the U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Peck struck down a provision that used the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“LBHI”) to trigger subordination of a Lehman subsidiary’s swap claim against a securitization vehicle in the United Kingdom.1

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Collateral (finance), Interest, Swap (finance), Deed, Default (finance), Collateralized debt obligation, Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, Bank of New York Mellon, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Fabien Carruzzo
    Location:
    United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Second Circuit Holds That So-Called “Flip” Clause Payments Are Protected by Section 560 of the Bankruptcy Code
    2020-09-08

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Collateralized debt obligation, Credit default swap, Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit, Trustee
    Authors:
    David E. Blabey, Jr
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Flow-through Tax Status as a Property Right? The Case of Schroeder Brothers Farms
    2020-01-13

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Fifth Circuit Disallows Make-Whole Payment in Bankruptcy
    2019-02-13

    On Jan. 19, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated a bankruptcy court decision awarding Ultra Petroleum Corp. noteholders $201 million in make-whole payments and $186 million in post-petition interest. Under the note agreement, upon a bankruptcy filing, the issuer is obligated for a make-whole amount equal to the discounted value of the remaining scheduled payments (including principal and interest that would be due after prepayment) less the principal amount of the notes.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    David J. Fisher , David S. Berg , Fabien Carruzzo , Barry Herzog
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Bankruptcy Court Holds That Termination of Lease Does Not Equal Termination of Estate Property
    2018-07-05

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Authors:
    Michael Vatcher
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    First Circuit Holds Rejection of Trademark License Leaves Licensee With Only a Claim for Pre-petition Damages - No Right to Continued Use of Trademarks; Court Upholds Termination of Exclusive Distribution Rights
    2018-02-20

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, First Circuit
    Authors:
    Kelly E. Porcelli
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Funds Talk: August 2017
    2017-08-01

    Topics covered in this issue include:

    Filed under:
    USA, District of Columbia, Capital Markets, Corporate Finance/M&A, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Supreme Court to Hear Circuit Split Over Bankruptcy Safe Harbor Provision
    2017-05-30

    The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Merit Management Group L.P. v. FTI Consulting Inc. to resolve a circuit split over the interpretation of Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, the “safe harbor” provision that shields specified types of payments “made by or to (or for the benefit of)” a financial institution from avoidance on fraudulent transfer grounds.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Title 11 of the US Code, Eighth Circuit, SCOTUS, Eleventh Circuit, Sixth Circuit, Seventh Circuit, Tenth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 3190
    • Page 3191
    • Page 3192
    • Page 3193
    • Current page 3194
    • Page 3195
    • Page 3196
    • Page 3197
    • Page 3198
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days