Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    District court reverses and holds that “correct” name, not “legal” name, required on UCC-1 financing statement
    2012-10-31

    In a fairly controversial decision from January 2012, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois held that a financing statement must contain the “legal” name of an individual as it appears on the individual’s birth certificate. Miller v. State Bank of Arthur (In re Miller), Adv. P. No. 11-9055 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. Jan. 6, 2012). On appeal, the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois reversed and held that the Uniform Commercial Code requires only that a “correct” name appear on the financing statement.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Debtor, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    John T. Gregg , Patrick E. Mears , Deborah L. Thorne
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Barnes & Thornburg LLP
    A new kind of PIN: essential requirements for recording deeds of trusts in North Carolina
    2012-10-17

    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in the case of In Re: McCormick that a recorded North Carolina deed of trust indexed in a county’s grantor/grantee index may nevertheless be avoided by a trustee in bankruptcy if such county has elected a Parcel Identification Number (“PIN”) indexing system and the recorded deed of trust does not appear in such PIN index.  This alert briefly describes the PIN system in North Carolina and the McCormick decision’s impact on the need for PINs in deeds of trust recorded in North Carolina counties that have adopted the PIN

    Filed under:
    USA, North Carolina, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Real Estate, Poyner Spruill LLP
    Authors:
    Christopher H. Roede , Jill C. Walters
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Poyner Spruill LLP
    Lithium-ion battery manufacturer, A123 systems, files for bankruptcy in Delaware
    2012-10-17

    On October 16, 2012, battery maker A123 Systems, Inc., and various subsidiaries, filed chapter 11 petitions for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.  A123 started its business in 2001 seeking to capitalize on the growing use of lithium-ion batteries in transportation and energy systems.  According to papers filed with the Bankruptcy Court, the company first began producing commercial batteries in 2006.  See Declaration of David Prystash in Support of Chapter 11 Petitions and First Day Motions (hereinafter the "Decl.") at *4.  By

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Massachusetts, Michigan, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, NASDAQ, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Losing acquiror in competing reorganization plan fight has standing to seek reimbursement of fees and expenses
    2012-10-18

    A New York bankruptcy court recently held that a losing acquiror in a competing Chapter 11 plan fight had “standing” to seek reimbursement of its legal fees and expenses as a “substantial contribution” to the reorganization case. In re S & Y Enterprises, LLC, et al., 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 4622, at *4-*5 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y., September 28, 2012). Nevertheless, the losing acquiror failed to recover because, in the court’s view, it did not satisfy the statutory requirements for reimbursement with the requisite “preponderance of the evidence.” Id.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Interest, Standing (law), Legal burden of proof, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Don’t place blind reliance on boilerplate contract provisions
    2012-10-18

    After putting all of the specific deal points into a new contract, you are just about finished.  All you have to do now is add in the “Miscellaneous” section with all of your boilerplate provisions like force majeure, choice of law and a few others.  You have drafted so many contracts for so many years that you do not even know where some of the

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Burns & Levinson LLP
    Authors:
    Shepard Davidson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Burns & Levinson LLP
    “Vacuous” landlord lien claim: there are limits to advocacy
    2012-10-18

    Huntington Nat’l Bank v. Bruinsma (In re Kentwood Pharmacy, L.L.C.) 478 B.R. 602 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2012) –

    Filed under:
    USA, Michigan, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Troutman Pepper, Debtor, Landlord, Personal property, Common law
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Commercial financial services brief: low income tax credits must be included in debtor’s plan valuation
    2012-10-18

    In what it described as a novel issue of law in the Eighth Circuit (the Federal Circuit including Minnesota and North Dakota), the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Eighth Circuit recently ruled in In re Lewis and Clark Apartments, LP that, in a valuation of the debtor’s low income housing project for purposes of its proposed Plan of Reorganization, the value of the low income housing tax credits (LIHTC) attributable to the project must be included.  While this is a result lenders involved in the LIHTC industry may have assumed, it was not settled

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lathrop GPM, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Tax credit, Interest, Limited partnership, Eighth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Authors:
    Scott T. Larison
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lathrop GPM
    A closer look at the Satcon Technology bankruptcy
    2012-10-21

    On October 17, 2012, Satcon Technology Corporation and various of its subsidiaries (collectively, "Satcon") filed chapter 11 petitions for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.  Satcon's subsidiaries include Satcon Power Systems, Inc., Satcon Electronics, Inc., Satcon Power Systems, LLC, Satcon International and Satcon Technology.  As stated in Satcon's Declaration filed with the Delaware Bankruptcy Court (the "Decl."), Satcon provides "utility-grade po

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Renewable energy, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    A123 files Chapter 11
    2012-10-21

    Electric vehicle battery manufacturer A123, which received a $249 million stimulus grant from the Department of Energy, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection October 15 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to facilitate an agreement in which Johnson Controls will purchase its automotive business assets for $125 million. The company has drawn down roughly $131 million of its grant, and has faced problems with batteries supplied to Fisker as well as low demand for electric vehicles.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Mintz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Back Yard Burgers files for bankruptcy in Delaware
    2012-10-23

    On October 17, 2012, Back Yard Burgers, Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1828
    • Page 1829
    • Page 1830
    • Page 1831
    • Current page 1832
    • Page 1833
    • Page 1834
    • Page 1835
    • Page 1836
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days