07 March 2014
[2014] EWCA Civ 215
Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Patten, Lewison and Sharp LJJ)

The Court of Appeal, reversing the first instance decision, held that moneys paid to an agent after the agent’s insolvency were available for agent’s creditors generally and were not held on trust for the principal.

Introduction In the case of Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA v Akers & Another¹ the Court of Appeal considered the parameters of litigation privilege, providing a useful reminder of how narrow the protection is and the care that must be taken in relation to the production of documents by third parties where a dispute is, or may be, on the horizon.

Key point

Under English law it is now clear that, in order to trace monies through bank accounts, it is not necessary that payments should occur in any specific order. 

The facts

Key point

Where in a UK administration an action would give some benefit to creditors, and risk neither detriment to them nor impede the administration's progress, the court may be willing to intervene and support a challenge to the administrator's actions.

The facts

The Privy Council has handed down judgment in the claim brought by the liquidators of Fairfield Sentry Limited ("Fairfield") against a number of redeemed investors, seeking to recover the amounts paid out to them on redemption.

Introduction

The Chancellor’s 2014 Budget speech revealed significant  changes to the way in which pension scheme members will be  able to access their savings. This move falls as just one of a raft  of changes to workplace pensions which Steve Webb MP has  described as a “pensions revolution”.

Insolvent Defendants

Corporate Insolvency

Dissolution

1. Corporate bodies (limited companies or LLPs) have a separate legal identity that ceases to exist upon dissolution. Dissolution can occur, broadly speaking, in two ways, one is at the end of the process of winding up (whether voluntary or compulsory) and the other is by the process of striking off the Register of Companies 

or limited liability partnerships. The latter occurs either as a result of the company’s

On 8 May 2014, the Supreme Court ordered the CPS to pay the costs and expenses of a receiver appointed over assets, which were not recoverable from a defendant under investigation (Barnes (the former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group and another [2014] UKSC 26).

10 April 2014
[2014] EWHC 1132 (Ch)
Chancery Division (HHJ Simon Barker QC)

Instead of making an administration order as sought and which was unopposed, the Court brought on an extant winding up petition for hearing and appointed a provisional liquidator.

24 February 2014
[2014] EWCA Civ 180
Court of Appeal (Patten, Lewison and Sharp LJJ)

The fact that rent payable in advance had fallen due prior to the tenant company entering administration did not prevent that that rent being payable an expense of the liquidation of the tenant company under the salvage/Lundy Granite principle.  The amount of rent so payable was a question of fact.