Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    An Unresolved Issue at the Intersection of Consignment and Bankruptcy Law Decided
    2019-04-11

    It always amazes me when, after more than a half-century of Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) jurisprudence, an issue one thinks would arise quite commonly appears never to have been decided in a reported case. Such an issue was recently decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in an adversary proceeding in the Pettit Oil Co. Chapter 7 case.[1]

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    David W. Dykhouse
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court Rules that Intercreditor Agreement does not Promise Senior Creditors a “Smooth Bankruptcy”
    2019-04-15

    Junior creditors are often described as holding a “silent second” under standard intercreditor agreements, which address the relative rights of senior and junior creditors and the extent to which junior creditors can seek to enforce remedies without the consent of senior creditors. The increased complexity of capital structures has led to litigation over the degree junior creditors must remain silent after the borrower has commenced a chapter 11 case.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Evan M. Jones , Jennifer Taylor
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    O'Melveny & Myers LLP
    Admit and Legislators Acknowledge That Real Estate Professionals Are Human and Need Protection From Harmless Errors
    2019-04-02

    Ohio and other states where Frost Brown Todd has offices have long had witness and/or notary requirements for the execution of mortgages. Ohio Revised Code Section 5301.01 provides that a “mortgage . . . shall be signed by the . . . mortgagor. . . . The signing shall be acknowledged by the . . . mortgagor . . . before a . . . notary public . . .

    Filed under:
    USA, Ohio, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Frost Brown Todd LLP
    Authors:
    Vincent E. Mauer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Frost Brown Todd LLP
    The Ninth Circuit Finds Inaccurate Credit Reporting Alone Does Not Confer Article III Standing
    2019-04-04

    On March 25, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dealt another setback to plaintiffs trying to establish Article III standing to assert a claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. (“FCRA”). In five related FCRA appeals combined in Jaras v. Equifax, Inc., 2019 WL 1373198 (9th Cir. Mar.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, BCLP, Fair Credit Reporting Act 1970 (USA)
    Authors:
    Matthew M. Petersen
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    BCLP
    Taking Care with Collateral Descriptions in UCC Financing Statements
    2019-04-04

    Collateral descriptions in financing statements are often an afterthought for secured creditors, and are frequently prepared in the simplest way possible, sometimes due to carelessness, sometimes because the debtor wishes to maintain its privacy by not disclosing specific pieces of collateral or investments, and sometimes due to administrative simplicity to minimize the cost and hassle of future amendments to financing statements in deals where the debtor regularly exchanges collateral of the same type.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Limited liability company, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    Peter Beardsley
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Loeb & Loeb LLP
    Bankruptcy Court Gives And Then Takes Away In Latest Stern-Related Ruling
    2019-04-05

    What are the limits of a bankruptcy court’s authority to issue final orders and judgments? Does a bankruptcy court have authority under Article III of the U.S. Constitution to enter final orders in quintessential bankruptcy matters such as fraudulent transfer claims, or are the court’s powers more constrained? While the Supreme Court’s rulings in Stern v. Marshall, 546 U.S. 462 (2011), Executive Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison, 573 U.S. 25 (2014) and Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 135 S. Ct.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    Mark A. Salzberg
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Consignment, the UCC, and You - Protecting Your Goods and Their Proceeds
    2019-03-28

    In a consignment distribution model, a third party Warehouse (the consignee) takes possession of goods on behalf of a Vendor (the consignor) for sale to Customers.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buchalter, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    Joseph M. Welch
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Buchalter
    Filling an Enforcement “Make-Whole”: Bankruptcy Court Enforces Prepayment Premium Notwithstanding Prepetition Loan Acceleration
    2019-03-28

    On March 18, 2019, Judge Stuart M. Bernstein of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision enforcing a mortgage lender’s claim for a prepayment premium (a/k/a make-whole or yield maintenance premium) notwithstanding the lender’s prepetition acceleration of the loan due to the debtor’s default.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Liquidated damages, Second Circuit, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Ingrid Bagby , Eric Waxman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Make whole prepayment premium enforceable even after loan acceleration
    2019-03-28

    In In re 1141 Realty Owner LLC, et al., No. 18-12341 (SMB), 2019 WL 1270818 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. March 18, 2019), Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York recently reaffirmed that upon sufficient contractual language, "make whole" prepayment premiums are enforceable under New York law even after loan acceleration. The court emphasized that the language of the contract provided for such a result and that this was an enforceable liquidated damages clause under New York law.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells
    Authors:
    Ronald Silverman , Sara Posner
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Fifth Circuit Holds that Chapter 11 Plan Does not "Impair" Claimants by Denying Make-Whole Rights and Contractual Interest
    2019-03-29

    In Keystone Gas Gathering, L.L.C.v. Ad Hoc Committee of Unsecured Creditorsof Ultra Resources, Incorporated (In re Ultra Petroleum Corporation), Case No. 17-20793, –F.3d–, 2019 WL 237365 (5th Cir. Jan. 17, 2019) (Oldham, J.), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that a class of creditors is not “impaired” by a reorganization plan simply because it (a) incorporates the Bankruptcy Code’s restrictions on payment of unmatured interest and (b) fails to award unsecured creditors interest at the contractual rate.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, FisherBroyles LLP, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    H. Joseph Acosta
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    FisherBroyles LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1268
    • Page 1269
    • Page 1270
    • Page 1271
    • Current page 1272
    • Page 1273
    • Page 1274
    • Page 1275
    • Page 1276
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days