In This Issue:

U.S. Supreme Court: Creditors May Immediately Appeal Denials of Automatic-Stay Relief

Faced with constantly evolving circumstances in these challenging times, officers and directors should not lose sight of what is arguably their most important corporate role–that is, as a fiduciary. The question, particularly as a corporation’s financial situation changes and restructuring is being considered, is: Who is that fiduciary duty owed to? Unfortunately, the answer depends on whether the corporation is insolvent or near insolvent, which is why being vigilant now will help avoid scrutiny by creditors later.

A new trend is brewing in bankruptcy courts: debtors are increasingly able to use the courts’ general equitable powers for assistance in weathering the current economic storm. These pandemic-related equitable arguments may significantly impact the marketplace—positively or negatively depending on your position—specifically as it relates to lease performance and also in general.

In light of the ongoing economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, and although Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code pertains to many industries, there are certain real estate related provisions of which owners and tenants should remain particularly aware in planning strategies to cope with the fallout from the current health crisis.

To raise awareness in that regard, the following is a general summary of some of the more critical provisions of the Code.

Single Asset Real Estate Entity

In Thakkar v. Bay Point Capital Partners, LP (In re Bay Circle Properties, LLC), 2020 WL 1696303 (11th Cir. Apr. 8, 2020), the Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal because the only appellant remaining after a settlement lacked Article III standing (and in any event failed to meet the “person aggrieved doctrine” standard for appealing a bankruptcy court order).

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, Public Law No. 116-136 (the “CARES Act” or the “Act”), the stimulus package designed to mitigate the widespread economic impacts of the coronavirus (“COVID-19”). The Act includes important temporary modifications [1] to Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”), applicable to small -business debtor reorganizations.

Temporary Increase in Debt Limit

Recent emergency motions from Modell’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (“Modell’s) and Pier 1 Imports, Inc. (“Pier 1”) to put their chapter 11 cases on ice may signal a growing trend. As the economic consequences of efforts to contain and respond to COVID-19 infections render deal-making difficult or impossible, what were the best-laid plans a few weeks ago often no longer make sense.

In response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, many employers in various industries have been reducing hours and pay, or in many cases, closing their sites indefinitely. Employers can reference the article below for strategic ways to limit their liability when terminating or laying off employees during the coronavirus pandemic and contact Ice Miller LLP for additional information and assistance.

COVID-19 is taking an alarming and unfortunate toll on our country’s population. Each day, we collectively face daunting health risks, and the economic cost to individuals and businesses alike has already been, and will continue to be, staggering. Accordingly, more than at any point in the past decade, both debtors and creditors should consider the potential benefits of the bankruptcy process. This post discusses four basic bankruptcy concepts that always merit consideration, especially in these trying times.

In 2017, in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court,1 the Supreme Court of the United States held that, in federal cases involving multiple plaintiffs, each plaintiff must establish that the court has personal jurisdiction over each of its claims.2 This severely limited the forums where plaintiffs could bring multiple-plaintiff cases against defendants.