Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Making claims in administration/liquidation as an unsecured creditor: the process of proving debts owed by the company
    2010-09-08

    Insolvency procedures involving companies are complex and generally take a long time to complete. There is plenty of jargon which adds to the confusion, whereas all that an unsecured creditor usually wants to know is how to make a claim for the monies owed to him by the company, to whom the claim should be made, how long it will take to decide the claim and whether there is a possibility of recovering any monies from a company which is obviously experiencing financial difficulties.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, BDB Pitmans LLP, Shareholder, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Debt, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Dissolution (law), Unsecured creditor, Pro rata, Companies House
    Authors:
    Rita Sarkar
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    BDB Pitmans LLP
    In pursuit of universality in cross-border insolvency
    2010-08-05

    The Court of Appeal1 has ruled that foreign judgments in insolvency proceedings may be enforced by the English courts at common law, and that the ordinary principles which may prevent the enforcement of foreign judgments do not apply to insolvency judgments where the action from which the foreign judgment arises is integral to the collective nature of the insolvency proceedings.

    Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Debtor, Consumer protection, Liquidation, Common law, Enforcement of foreign judgments, In rem jurisdiction, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice (England & Wales), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Devi Shah , Jennifer Fox
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    Recent developments in English insolvency law
    2010-07-09

    The summer months are upon us, and developments in insolvency law and practice continue apace. Since our Spring issue the courts have pronounced in a number of interesting cases. At the time of writing, the World Cup is underway – it would perhaps be remiss not to have some football flavour in this article, and so some observations on the plight of Portsmouth FC are appropriate (though saved till the end).

    Successive notices of intention to appoint administrators: more than one moratorium?

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Legal personality, Abuse of process, Limited partnership, Liquidation, Moratorium, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Graeme D. Levy
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Statutory liens and aircraft operators
    2010-07-09

    In the case of Global Knafaim Leasing Ltd & Anor v The Civil Aviation Authority & Ors [2010] EWHC 1348 (Admin), the UK’s High Court held that the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and BAA Ltd. (BAA) were entitled to a statutory lien of a lessor’s aircraft, to ensure a lessor pays all the outstanding route and aircraft charges of an insolvent operator and its fleet of aircraft, and not just those related to the aircraft of the lessor.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Aviation, Insolvency & Restructuring, Squire Patton Boggs, Legal burden of proof, Liquidation, Proportionality (law), Right to a fair trial, European Convention on Human Rights, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Insolvency and arbitration— the English perspective
    2010-07-20

    Arbitration proceedings in England are creatures of contract, arising out of the agreement between the parties to refer their disputes to arbitration. However, except in limited circumstances, when one of the parties to an arbitration agreement becomes insolvent, England’s statutory insolvency regime takes precedence over the rules of the arbitration.

    The Insolvency Regime in England and Wales

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mayer Brown, Costs in English law, Debtor, Consideration, Liquidation, UNCITRAL, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Jonathan Hosie , Devi Shah
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    Powerhouse - still powerful?
    2010-07-27

    In June 2007 we reported on the decision in Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v PRG Powerhouse Limited. Although the case has given rise to a great deal of debate, until now there has been no subsequent reported case in which the court has had to consider whether and how a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) might fairly effect a compromise of a landlord's claim against a guarantor of its tenant.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Gowling WLG, Surety, Debtor, Dividends, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Liquidation, Prejudice, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    Exercise of the fleet lien in the UK
    2010-07-30

    R (on the application of Global Knafaim Leasing Ltd and another) v. Civil Aviation Authority and another

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Aviation, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morton Fraser MacRoberts, Legal burden of proof, Liquidation, Due diligence, Airport, Right to a fair trial
    Authors:
    Beverley Wood
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Morton Fraser MacRoberts
    You go bust, your assets are mine! The anti-deprivation rule considered
    2010-05-31

    There is something positively Dickensian when looking at the anti-deprivation rule (the "rule") and images come up of scribes working in dark and dismal rooms scratching their quills by dim candle light. Indeed, the rule dates back to the nineteenth century and many lawyers would be hard-pressed to explain it even if they are able to grasp the contradictions and fine distinctions thrown up by the old cases. In essence, the rule provides that a contractual provision is void if it provides for the transfer of an asset from the owner to a third party upon the insolvency of the owner.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Share (finance), Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Joint venture, Liquidation, Fair market value, Common law, Articles of association, Liquidator (law), Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Michael Rutstein , Victoria Ferguson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    When trade finance meets insolvency
    2010-06-09

    There has been an upturn in the frequency of trade finance workouts, restructurings and formal insolvencies. Drew Sainsbury looks at some key issues that banks face when trade finance lending passes to “bad bank”.

    The bank’s decisions at every stage of a trade finance transaction are critical: at origination; when following a workout/restructuring; and once a formal insolvency process becomes a reality.

    Origination

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Credit risk, Liquidation, Payment protection insurance
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Creditors may not use foreign attachments to secure debts from companies in liquidation
    2010-06-22

    In Harms Offshore AHT ‘Taurus’ GmbH & Co KG v Bloom [2009] EWCA Civ 632, the English Court of Appeal had to decide whether it would grant an order to vacate an attachment on the property of a company in administration, even though the attachment was obtained by a creditor in a foreign court.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Rajah & Tann Asia, Debt, Liquidation, Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Rajah & Tann Asia

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 116
    • Page 117
    • Page 118
    • Page 119
    • Current page 120
    • Page 121
    • Page 122
    • Page 123
    • Page 124
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days