Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Bankruptcy issues in intercreditor agreements
    2009-05-31

    Introduction

    This article addresses bankruptcy issues commonly arising in connection with intercreditor agreements, and is intended to provide a general examination of provisions that relate specifically to bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings. By reviewing variations of these provisions that have appeared in negotiated second lien financings, the discussion provides a checklist that will be useful at the front end of deals of this kind.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Debt, Limited partnership, Default (finance), Leverage (finance), Convertible bond, Bank of America
    Authors:
    Jeffrey A. Marks
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Bankruptcy Courts Closing In - Will An Agreement Requiring Unanimous Consent To File For Bankruptcy Be Effective?
    2016-07-07

    We’ve all seen it. The business opportunity looks enticing but is laced with risk about a potential bankruptcy filing down the road. As bankruptcy lawyers we are often asked how deals can be structured to prevent a potential bankruptcy filing.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave), Bankruptcy, Legal personality, Debtor, Waiver, Fiduciary, Copyright infringement, Limited liability company, Consent, Limited partnership, Default (finance), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, US District Court for Northern District of Illinois
    Authors:
    Natalie Daghbandan
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave)
    Creditors of insolvent Delaware limited liability companies blocked from suing managers for breach of fiduciary duty
    2010-11-24

    In today’s turbulent economic climate, it is vital for creditors and debtors to understand the precise boundaries of their rights and duties when an enterprise becomes insolvent. Directors, officers and managers must acknowledge those to whom they owe fiduciary duties and fulfill those duties at the risk of personal liability, while creditors evaluate their potential remedies against misbehaving insiders to collect on defaulted obligations.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave), Debtor, Breach of contract, Fraud, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Limited liability company, Standing (law), Limited partnership, Liability (financial accounting), Default (finance), Derivative suit, Delaware General Corporation Law, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave)
    Lending to Jersey entities
    2018-08-21

    Introduction

    Jersey entities have proved popular as vehicles for a wide variety of asset holding structures, such as those holding real property. The modern legal framework and tax neutral regime are attractive to professionals structuring transactions for their clients. As a consequence, lending institutions are frequently requested to put in place credit arrangements for Jersey entities. To protect its position in these circumstances, a lending institution needs to be aware of the material differences that exist between English law and Jersey law.

    Filed under:
    Jersey, Banking, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Ogier, Limited partnership
    Authors:
    Katrina Edge , Bruce MacNeil
    Location:
    Jersey
    Firm:
    Ogier
    Variety is the spice of life: recent cases at the Jersey Royal Court
    2018-07-11

    The Royal Court in Jersey has a varied and challenging workload. The cases that have come before it this quarter certainly live up to that description. Here we discuss just a handful of cases that the Royal Court has determined, that, whilst in some respects are unremarkable, in other respects serve to illustrate the breadth of the experience that the Royal Court judiciary possesses.

    Representation of Private Equity Fund Finance Limited [2018] JRC 194

    Filed under:
    Jersey, Arbitration & ADR, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ogier, Bankruptcy, Private equity, Limited partnership, Comity, Election, Construction contracts, Trustee
    Location:
    Jersey
    Firm:
    Ogier
    Close-out netting and set-off provisions for BVI, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Jersey and Luxembourg counterparties
    2013-11-05

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Jersey, Luxembourg, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Private Client & Offshore Services, Ogier, Swap (finance), Limited partnership, Liquidation, International Swaps and Derivatives Association
    Authors:
    Bruce MacNeil
    Location:
    British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Jersey, Luxembourg
    Firm:
    Ogier
    Insolvency of Guernsey funds
    2009-07-15

    Introduction

    If a fund is insolvent, it is either not able to pay its debts as they fall due, or its assets are less than its liabilities. An investor/creditor will have the ability to put the fund into a formal insolvency procedure and, in most cases, appoint an independent third party to take control of the assets and investigate the conduct of the fund’s directors, managers and other controlling functionaries. Defined terms in this article are the same as the terms which were defined in the potential causes of action article.  

    Filed under:
    Guernsey, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Ogier, Legal personality, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Board of directors, Debt, Personal property, Limited partnership, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Balance sheet, Investment funds, Cashflow, Liquidator (law)
    Location:
    Guernsey
    Firm:
    Ogier
    Exempted limited partnerships: winding up, dissolution and other changes
    2009-04-30

    The Exempted Limited Partnership (Amendment) Law, 2009, which was enacted in March 2009 and is expected to come into effect before the end of April 2009, has made significant changes to the regime for the winding up and dissolution of exempted limited partnerships (“Partnerships”). The opportunity has also been taken to clarify certain other provisions of the Exempted Limited Partnership Law (2007 Revision) (“ELP Law”).  

    Winding Up and Dissolution  

    Filed under:
    Cayman Islands, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Ogier, Contractual term, Bankruptcy, Limited partnership, Liquidation, Dissolution (law), Articles of partnership, Constitutional amendment
    Location:
    Cayman Islands
    Firm:
    Ogier
    Court rules Houston Astros cannot strike out fiduciary duties in bankruptcy
    2014-03-05

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dechert LLP, Bankruptcy, Legal personality, Fiduciary, Limited liability company, Limited partnership, Debtor in possession
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dechert LLP
    Church Joint Venture, L.P. v. Blasingame (In re Blasingame)
    2016-06-08

    (6th Cir. June 6, 2016)

    The Sixth Circuit affirms the B.A.P. and dismisses the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Following the principal creditor’s objection, the bankruptcy court denied the trustee and debtors’ motion to approve a settlement of a legal malpractice claim held by the estate. The debtors appealed. The court finds that the appealed order was not a final order that could be appealed because the debtors were free to propose a new settlement for approval. Opinion below.

    Judge: Kethledge

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, Debtor, Limited partnership, United States bankruptcy court, Sixth Circuit
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Current page 10
    • Page 11
    • Page 12
    • Page 13
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days