Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Reorganised businesses and insolvencies – tax pitfalls you can avoid
    2008-10-09

    A business you are buying or selling, if reorganised for sale, may be less valuable if you do not avoid tax pitfalls. This note highlights the most common pitfalls, including those related to an insolvency. You can avoid most with planning.

    Reorganisations

    Many businesses will now be considering transactions involving corporate reorganisations. They might want to take advantage of market conditions to buy or be considering the sale of business units to refocus strategy. Or they might become involved in an insolvency or reconstruction.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Dentons, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Value added tax, Accounting, Swap (finance), Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Beneficial ownership, Subsidiary, Stamp duty, HM Revenue and Customs (UK)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Reconstructions - tax problems you can avoid
    2008-10-09

    A business you are buying or selling, if reorganised for sale, may be less valuable if you do not avoid tax pitfalls. This note highlights the most common pitfalls, including those related to an insolvency. You can avoid most with planning.

    Reorganisations

    Many businesses will now be considering transactions involving corporate reorganisations. They might want to take advantage of market conditions to buy or be considering the sale of business units to refocus strategy. Or they might become involved in an insolvency or reconstruction.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Dentons, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Value added tax, Accounting, Swap (finance), Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Land value tax, Beneficial ownership, Subsidiary, Stamp duty, HM Revenue and Customs (UK)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Controversial releases acceptable in asset backed commercial paper CCAA Plan of Arrangement
    2008-09-30

    The Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed the asset backed commercial paper CCAA Plan of Arrangement (2008 CaswellOnt 4811 (C.A.)). The reasoning of the Ontario Superior Court approving the Plan of Arrangement was reviewed in previous editions of this Newsletter.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Debtor, Security (finance), Fraud, Market liquidity, Swap (finance), Margin (finance), Liability (financial accounting), Maturity (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Credit default swap, Commercial paper, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Employer debt – timing the calculation
    2012-03-26

    Pension scheme assets can rise and fall. So can liabilities. The timing of the section 75 debt calculation is, therefore, critically important to the ability of the scheme to meet its liabilities.

    So when should trustees calculate their section 75 debt? Can they use one date to calculate scheme assets and choose a different date to calculate the cost of buying out the scheme’s liabilities?

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Debt, Liability (financial accounting)
    Authors:
    Alan Jarvis , Elmer Doonan , Andrew Patten , Harriet Fletcher
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation issues proposed rule clarifying implementation of Section 404 which treats bankruptcy filing date as "plan termination date" for certain purposes
    2008-07-17

    Bankruptcy practitioners and plan beneficiaries should take note of a little-known ERISA amendment that impacts bankruptcy cases filed on or after September 16, 2006. On June 30, 2008, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC") released a proposed rule clarifying how Section 404 ("Section 404") of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the "PPA") will be implemented. Section 404 amends Title IV of ERISA in certain key respects.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Debtor, Trade union, Beneficiary, Liability (financial accounting), Sponsor (commercial), Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Contribution notices: the Bonas case and its aftermath
    2011-07-21

    TPR settled its dispute with Michael Van de Wiele (VdW) in relation to its UK pension scheme and issued a Contribution Notice (CN) for £60,000. Although this is significantly less than the £21 million originally sought and the £5.08 million decided by the Determinations Panel, TPR says it is “business as usual” for the use of its statutory anti-avoidance powers. A settlement at this level might be viewed as a defeat for TPR and an indication that CNs are not a potent weapon to deal with the avoidance of employer debts. That view would be seriously misguided.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Market value, Trustee
    Authors:
    Elmer Doonan , Alan Jarvis , Andrew Patten
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Is there any value left in floating charges?
    2011-03-08

    Where lenders rely on floating charge security to make recoveries from companies in administration, some recent cases have massively increased the potential for administration expenses to swallow up those recoveries. The more well-known cases could just be the start. So, what are the potential risks? What can lenders do in the face of the law as it currently stands? What is going to happen next?

    The Nortel decisions

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Unsecured debt, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Debenture, The Pensions Regulator, House of Lords, High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Ian Fox
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Treasury to end NR guarantees
    2010-08-06

    Treasury has announced the next stage of withdrawal of government support for Northern Rock. It will end its guarantee on wholesale liabilities in three months' time, earlier than planned.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Liability (financial accounting), HM Treasury (UK)
    Authors:
    Robert Finney
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Guarantees – time to brush up the non-competition clause
    2010-06-09

    Financial guarantees often contain non-competition clauses. This is mainly to:  

    • increase the financier’s recoveries from its principal debtor, by stopping the guarantor from draining money from the principal debtor; and  
    • prevent the guarantor from obstructing a restructuring of the principal debtor’s liabilities.  

    A recent case suggests these clauses should expressly exclude the “rule in Cherry v. Boultbee”. Zoë Thirlwell and Alexander Hewitt explain.

    Counter-indemnity rights  

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Surety, Debtor, Liability (financial accounting), HSBC, Trustee
    Authors:
    Zoe Thirlwell , Alexander Hewitt
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    FMLC responds on investment banking insolvency
    2010-04-09

    FMLC has responded on aspects of Treasury’s consultations on resolution of investment banks. The paper’s main recommendations include:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Security (finance), Investment banking, Liability (financial accounting), Companies Act, HM Treasury (UK)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 54
    • Page 55
    • Page 56
    • Page 57
    • Current page 58
    • Page 59
    • Page 60
    • Page 61
    • Page 62
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days