Analysis GA&P | July 2015 1 Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings has replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000. This new Regulation, which will apply to insolvency proceedings opened after 26 June 2017 (art. 86), contains relevant changes. In this paper we will address one of the most significant: the inclusion of specific rules concerning the treatment of insolvency proceedings of the members of a group of companies (new discipline contained in Chapter V of the Regulation, comprising arts.

On 20 May 2015 the European Parliament adopted a recast of the European Insolvency Regulation. The Recast Regulation is in line with the EU’s current political priorities of promoting economic recovery and boosting growth and employment. The key objectives of the Recast Regulation are to move away from the traditional liquidation approach towards more of a “second chance approach” for businesses and entrepreneurs in financial difficulties, and to enhance cooperation and coordination in cross-border insolvency proceedings. 

Scope

Background

Facts
Extension for intermingling of assets
Issues

On April 13 2010 the Court of Cassation rendered a noteworthy decision sending two interlocutory questions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In anticipation of the ECJ's decision, this update examines the issues raised before the Court of Cassation.

SUMMARY

French bankruptcy law has been recently modified by Law no. 2012-346 of March 12, 2012 relating to protective measures (mesures conservatoires) applicable to safeguard, recovery and liquidation proceedings, and by Law no. 2012-387 of March 22, 2012 relating to the simplification and easing of administrative procedures.

In France, when bankruptcy proceedings are instituted against a party involved in a pending arbitration it can result in conflicts between the applicable arbitration and insolvency rules. In that context, an arbitral tribunal sitting in France may be confronted with determining the extent to which they must defer to mandatory insolvency rules.

In July 2006, after a long and unsuccessful attempt to reach an out-of-court restructuring of the indebtedness of the Eurotunnel group of companies, the managers of the Eurotunnel group requested the opening of main insolvency proceedings for all the companies in France.

Article L 611-4 to L 611-15 of the French Commerce Code.

Act n° 2005-845 of 26 July 2005, as completed and amended, has created a new out-of-court settlement process known under French law as “Conciliation,” replacing the former amicable settlement or “règlement amiable.”

In Body Corporate 162791 v Gilbert [2014] NZHC 567, the High Court found that receivers are not personally liable under s 32(5) of the Receiverships Act 1993 (the Act) for body corporate levies under the Unit Titles Act 2010.

The facts

The Court of Appeal has found that receivers can be personally liable for body corporate levies accrued during a receivership.

The judgment is based on a broader interpretation of the relevant provisions in the Receiverships Act 1993 than applied by the High Court in Body Corporate 162791 v Gilbert, and reverses that decision.¹