Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Not all bankruptcy “core” proceedings are created equal: a limitation on state law lender liability claims in bankruptcy court after Stern v. Marshall
    2011-09-14

    The scenario has become all too familiar in recent years: a borrower defaults on a loan and, when the lender pursues the loan collateral through foreclosure or other proceedings, the borrower files for bankruptcy protection. More often than not, when the lender appears in bankruptcy court to pursue its interest in the collateral, the borrower counterattacks with a host of state law lender liability claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Interest, Tortious interference, Foreclosure, Default (finance), US Congress, Title 11 of the US Code, US Constitution, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Creditors of insolvent limited liability companies cannot sue derivatively
    2011-09-09

    The Supreme Court of Delaware recently held that creditors of insolvent Delaware limited liability companies (LLCs) lack standing to bring derivative suits on behalf of the LLCs.

    In March 2010, CML V brought both derivative and direct claims against the present and former managers of JetDirect Aviation Holdings LLC in the Court of Chancery after JetDirect defaulted on its loan obligations to CML. The Vice Chancellor dismissed all the claims, finding that, as a creditor, CML lacked standing to bring derivative claims on behalf of JetDirect, and CML appealed.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Statute of limitations, Limited liability company, Standing (law), Constitutionality, Involuntary dismissal, Default (finance), Supreme Court of the United States, Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court, Court of equity
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Second Circuit affirms Madoff trustee's net equity calculation
    2011-08-19

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit found in favor of the trustee (the Trustee) presiding over the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities (BMIS), affirming the Trustee’s calculation of “net equity” in the BMIS liquidation. The Trustee calculates net equity to determine the value of claims submitted by victims of Madoff’s massive fraud.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Security (finance), Fraud, Limited liability company, Liquidation, Market value, Trustee, Second Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Motion to dismiss claims against former officers and directors denied
    2007-04-06

    The District Court sustained claims of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and deepening insolvency asserted by the successor-in-interest to the Committee of Unsecured Creditors of DVI, a defunct company, against DVI’s former officers and directors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Fraud, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Interest, Credit risk, Misrepresentation, Good faith, Business judgement rule, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Westlaw
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    FDIC Rescinds De Novo Time Period Extension
    2016-04-08

    On April 6, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) rescinded Financial Institution Letter (FIL) 50-2009 entitled “Enhanced Supervisory Procedures for Newly Insured FDIC-Supervised Depository Institutions.” The FIL, among other measures, had extended the de novo period for newly organized, state nonmember institutions from three to seven years for examinations, capital maintenance and other requirements.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Sabine Court Issues Industry-Affecting Non-Binding Opinion
    2016-03-16

    The financial pressure on the oil and gas industry is well known. Dozens of oil and gas companies have defaulted on credit facilities or filed bankruptcy recently and industry observers expect many more to follow.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Jerry L. Hall
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    FDIC Approves Proposal on Deposit Recordkeeping Requirements in Large Bank Failures
    2016-02-26

    On February 17, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) approved a proposal for recordkeeping requirements for FDIC-insured institutions with a large number of deposit accounts to facilitate rapid payment of insured deposits to customers if those institutions were to fail. The proposed rule would apply to insured depository institutions with more than 2 million deposit accounts. Under the proposal, these institutions would generally be required to maintain complete and accurate data on each depositor.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    FDIC Seeks Comment on Revised Deposit Insurance Assessment Rule
    2016-02-05

    On January 21, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced that it was seeking comment on a revised proposed rule that would amend the way small banks are assessed for deposit insurance. The proposed rule would affect banks with less than $10 billion in assets that have been insured by the FDIC for at least five years.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Deposit insurance, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Sentinel Management’s Bank Held by Appellate Court to Have Been on Inquiry Notice of Cash-Management Firm’s Misuse of Customer Funds; Demoted to General Creditor Status
    2016-01-10

    A federal appeals court in Illinois held that Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Bank of New York (collectively, “BNYM”) were on “inquiry notice” that Sentinel Management Group, Inc. improperly used customer funds as collateral for a loan prior to the firm’s collapse in August 2007. (Sentinel was an investment management firm registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a futures commission merchant that claimed it specialized in short-term cash management for hedge funds, individuals, financial institutions and other FCMs.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Authors:
    Gary DeWaal
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    US judge rules JP Morgan’s collateral requests to Lehman Brothers in its dying days were mostly okay
    2015-10-04

    A federal judge in New York – the Hon. Richard J. Sullivan – mostly granted JP Morgan Chase Bank’s motion to dismiss claims brought on behalf of unsecured creditors of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. related to JPM’s requirement that Lehman Brothers Inc., LBH’s broker-dealer subsidiary, pledge and post extra collateral in September 2008, shortly before LBI filed for bankruptcy protection on September 15, 2008.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Collateral (finance), JPMorgan Chase, Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Gary DeWaal
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Current page 10
    • Page 11
    • Page 12
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days