Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Bankruptcy PLR with NOL preservation result
    2012-08-14

    Section 382 limits a loss corporation’s ability to use its Net Operating Losses (NOLs) carryforwards following an "ownership change."1 An ownership change is triggered if one or more "5-percent shareholders" of the loss corporation increase their ownership in the aggregate by more than 50 percentage points during a testing period. Following an ownership change, the "Section 382 limitation" generally reduces the ability to use NOLs to offset taxable income in any post-change year.2

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Troutman Pepper, Bankruptcy, Interest, Debt, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Conversion of insolvent corporation into a tax partnership: IRS reaches favorable conclusions, but questions remain
    2011-11-21

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Troutman Pepper, Shareholder, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Proposed regulations regarding the deferred loss rules for controlled groups: not all good but not all bad
    2011-06-16

    On April 20, 2011, the IRS issued proposed regulations under Treas. Reg. §1.267(f)-1(c) (the Proposed Regulations), which will become effective after they are adopted as final regulations. The Proposed Regulations modify the current deferred loss rules to allow the acceleration of a deferred loss in certain circumstances that routinely arise in international restructurings of U.S. companies. Accordingly, corporations in a controlled group that are considering a sale to another member of the controlled group should evaluate the consequences under the Proposed Regulations.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Troutman Pepper, Retail, Liquidation, Subsidiary, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Authors:
    Todd B. Reinstein
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Losses and successive ownership changes at the forefront of recent IRS rulings
    2011-03-03

    The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently issued rulings regarding the availability of tax losses after a bankruptcy,1 the ability to take a loss under Sections 165(a) and 165(g),2 and the characterization of a loss after an ownership change.3 There are few rulings or other sources of authority for these types of issues, and thus, a review of these rulings provides insight into the IRS’s current thinking on the issues addressed.

    PLR 201051020

    Filed under:
    USA, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Troutman Pepper, Bankruptcy, Security (finance), Interest, Limited liability company, Debt, Liquidation, Tax deduction, Holding company, Preferred stock, Troubled Asset Relief Program, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Update on Corporate Bankruptcy Tax Refund Litigation
    2021-01-28

    The bankruptcy trustee of a bank holding company was not entitled to a consolidated corporate tax refund when a bank subsidiary had incurred losses generating the refund, held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on May 26, 2020. Rodriguez v. FDIC (In re United Western Bancorp, Inc.), 2020 WL 2702425(10th Cir May 26, 2020). On remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Tenth Circuit, as directed, applied "Colorado law to resolve" the question of "who owns the federal tax refund." Id., at 2.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Tenth Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Tenth Circuit Applies State Law to Resolve Debtor’s Claimed Ownership of Tax Refund
    2020-05-29

    The bankruptcy trustee of a bank holding company was not entitled to a consolidated corporate tax refund when a bank subsidiary had incurred losses generating the refund, held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on May 26, 2020. Rodriguez v. FDIC (In re United Western Bancorp, Inc.), 2020 WL 2702425(10th Cir May 26, 2020). On remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Tenth Circuit, as directed, applied “Colorado law to resolve” the question of “who owns the federal tax refund.” Id., at *2.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Bankruptcy Court Preliminary Injunction Held Not Appealable
    2020-03-03

    A bankruptcy court’s preliminary injunction was “not a final and immediately appealable order,” held the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on Dec. 10, 2019. In re Alcor Energy, LLC, 2019 WL 6716420, 4 (D. Del. Dec. 10, 2019). The court declined to “exercise [its] discretion” under 28 U.S.C. §158(a)(3) to hear the interlocutory appeal. Id., citing 16 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, §3926.1 (3d ed. 2017) (“There is no provision for appeal as of right from an injunction order of a bankruptcy judge to the district court.”).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Internal Revenue Service (USA), United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Two Circuits Limit Creditors’ Setoff Rights in Bankruptcy Cases
    2018-10-18

    “The right of setoff … allows entities to apply their mutual debts against each other to avoid the pointless exercise of ‘making A pay B when B owes A.’” held the Seventh Circuit on Aug. 17, 2018. Berg v. Social Security Administration, 900 F.3d 864, 868 (7th Cir. 2018). But the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) limits “a creditor’s right of setoff during the ninety-day period prior to the” date of bankruptcy, said the court. Id.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Third Circuit, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Madoff, Picard and charities: a comparison of treatment of the Lautenberg Foundation and the Wilpon/Katz foundations - Part 2 - Installment 52
    2011-06-14

    This is the fifty-second in a series of installments on this blog that are discussing issues arising in the aftermath of the global Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Bernard L. Madoff (“Madoff”).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Non-profit Organizations, White Collar Crime, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Charitable organisation, Fair market value, Bénéfice, Form 990, Internal Revenue Service (USA), US Senate
    Authors:
    Alain Leibman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Service attempts to help tenancy-in-common investors exchanging like-kind property under section 1031 in workouts
    2011-03-16

    Now we can add Program Manager’s Technical Advice or “PMTA” to the list of administrative projects on tax matters that are open to FOIA and review by the tax practitioner community. One area that needs some help are investors in tenancy-in-common programs. On May 15, 2010, the Service issue PMTA 2010-05 which provides an legal analysis from Chief Counsel’s office directed to IRS program managers in the field.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Leasehold estate, Debt, Attorney's fee, Pro rata, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Authors:
    Jerald David August
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 19
    • Page 20
    • Page 21
    • Page 22
    • Page 23
    • Current page 24
    • Page 25
    • Page 26
    • Page 27
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days