Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Hon’ble Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of section 95 to section 100 of the IBC relating to personal guarantors
    2023-12-06

    1. INTRODUCTION

    On 9 November 2023, a three-judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra, while disposing off over 350 writ petitions, in Dilip B. Jiwarajka v. Union of India and Ors. 1 , upheld the constitutional validity of several key provisions [Section 95 to Section 100] of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) pertaining to the insolvency resolution process for individuals and partnership firms.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, INDUSLAW, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India
    Authors:
    Padmaja Kaul , Kushagra Sah
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    INDUSLAW
    Leased petroleum assets to be exempt from moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
    2023-11-29

    By a notification dated 14 June 2023 (read here), the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has exempted petroleum assets leased by a company undergoing insolvency proceedings from the moratorium provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

    Filed under:
    India, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Acuity Law, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India)
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Acuity Law
    Transactions under the Cape Town Convention exempted from the moratorium provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
    2023-11-29

    The Ministry of Corporate Affairs by notification dated 03 October 2023 (read here) exempted transactions, arrangements or agreements relating to aircraft, aircraft engines, airframes and helicopters under the Cape Town Convention and Protocol from the moratorium provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

    Filed under:
    India, Aviation, Insolvency & Restructuring, Acuity Law, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India)
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Acuity Law
    High Time for Group Insolvency Framework?!
    2023-11-27

    Group Insolvency: Introduction

    Group means two or more enterprises, which directly or indirectly are in a position to exercise 26% or more voting rights in other enterprise or appoint more than 50% members of the Board of Directors in the other enterprise or control the management or affairs of the other enterprise.[1]

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Vikash Kumar Jha , Shivansh Vishwakarma
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
    Between the lines- November, 2023
    2023-11-20

    November, 2023 For Private Circulation - Educational & Informational Purpose Only A BRIEFING ON LEGAL MATTERS OF CURRENT INTEREST KEY HIGHLIGHTS ⁎ Delhi HC: Claims settled under a resolution plan become non-arbitrable and a reference of those claims would amount to reopening of the resolution plan. ⁎ Delhi HC: Transfer of liabilities from a previous loan agreement makes the arbitration clauses in subsequent agreements, binding. * NCLAT: No bar on the initiation of CIRP, if default is committed prior to Section 10A Period and continues during the Section 10A Period.

    Filed under:
    India, Arbitration & ADR, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Vaish Associates Advocates, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Vaish Associates Advocates
    A preference shareholder is not a financial creditor unless the preference shares become due for redemption
    2023-11-20

    The National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench (“NCLT”), in EPC Constructions India Limited through its Liquidator – Abhijit Guhathkurtha v. M/s Matix Fertilizer and Chemicals Limited has ruled that preference shareholders cannot step into the shoes of a financial creditor unless their preference shares become redeemable.

    Brief Facts

    Filed under:
    India, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, JSA, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Sidharth Sethi , Kunal Saini
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    JSA
    Interplay of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961
    2023-11-20

    In a recent development, the Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions filed against its decision in State Tax Officer v Rainbow Papers Ltd., which had disturbed the settled position that in insolvency resolution proceedings, statutory dues (including tax claims) fall in the category of operational debt. Instead, the Supreme Court held that statutory dues qualify as debts owed to a secured creditor, and a resolution plan that ignores such debts is liable to be rejected.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Trilegal, Income-Tax Act 1961 (India), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Himanshu Sinha , Aditi Goyal , Aishwarya Palan
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Trilegal
    Government Dues under IBC: Rainbow Papers Explained
    2023-11-17

    Rainbow Papers: The Judgment

    In State Tax Officer (1) v. Rainbow Papers Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1162 ("Rainbow Papers"), the Supreme Court dealt with the question as to whether the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, ("IBC") (specifically Section 53) overrides Section 48 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 ("GVAT Act").

    Section 48 of the GVAT Act provides as follows.

    Section 48. Tax to be first charge on property:

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
    Weighing the Impact of IBBI’s Proposals for the Real Estate Sector
    2023-11-19

    The changes corresponding to the proposals are suggested in the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, and the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. The draft regulations have been annexed to the proposals.

    Comments on the proposals and the draft regulations have been sought by November 28, 2023.

    The Board’s proposals are as follows: –

    • Registration of corporate debtor’s real estate projects under RERA

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Fox Mandal, Insolvency, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India)
    Authors:
    Jayaprakash Padmanaban
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Fox Mandal
    Supreme Court holds that rent receivables assigned to a lender would not be assets of the borrower and fall outside the scope of the NCLAT’s Order freezing IL&FS’s assets and security
    2023-11-20

    In a recent decision in the case of Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd. v. HDFC Bank Ltd. and Another, the Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) has held that the rents receivable by a borrower which was assigned to a lender of a lease rental discounting facility would not be treated as an asset of the borrower, and thus fall outside the purview of the asset and security freeze order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”).

    Brief Facts

    Filed under:
    India, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, JSA, Power of attorney, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Dheeraj Nair , Tirthankar Datta , Angad Baxi , Malika Tiwari , Vedika Gandhi
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    JSA

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Current page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • Page 11
    • Page 12
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days