Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Turnaround or fall over?
    2011-03-07

    Corporate Debt Restructuring through a Company Voluntary Agreement

    In the current economic climate most businesses will experience temporary or longer term cash flow pressure resulting in stressful trading and creditor pressure.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, BDB Pitmans LLP, Contractual term, Unsecured debt, Dividends, Landlord, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Balance sheet, Moratorium, Cashflow, Subsidiary
    Authors:
    Suzanne Brooker , Adrian Wilmot
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    BDB Pitmans LLP
    Administrations and the impact of TUPE
    2011-03-07

    Since the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 were made in order to implement the European Union’s Council Directive 80/987/EEC, there has been an ongoing debate on how regulation 8 (7) (the bankruptcy proceedings exception) should be interpreted. Fortunately, a recent decision by the Employment Appeals Tribunal has gone some way towards clarifying the issue.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, BDB Pitmans LLP, Bankruptcy, Employment tribunal, Liquidation, Prejudice, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Jamie Lynch , Mark Symons
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    BDB Pitmans LLP
    Pre-pack sales carry TUPE price tag
    2011-02-23

    Last week the Employment Appeal Tribunal ruled in five conjoined appeals that TUPE applies in all administrations, since they constitute "relevant insolvency proceedings" and not "liquidation proceedings". This will be the case even in “pre-pack” administrations, where a business is placed into administration but immediately sold to a purchaser who has been lined up to buy the business beforehand.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mills & Reeve LLP, Contractual term, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Employment Appeal Tribunal
    Authors:
    Andrew Secker
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mills & Reeve LLP
    Court of Appeal upholds liquidator's decision to settle litigation despite opposition from creditors
    2011-02-25

    In this case, a liquidator had commenced proceedings against the former director of a company in relation to transactions which were alleged to have been made at an undervalue and/or with an intention to defraud creditors and/or which were preferential. It was also alleged that the former director had acted in breach of his fiduciary duties in procuring or permitting the transactions to take place.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Howes Percival LLP, Breach of contract, Fraud, Fiduciary, Liquidator (law), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court (Ireland)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Howes Percival LLP
    Clarification on the application of TUPE to administrations
    2011-02-28

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held in OTG Ltd v Barke (2011 UKEAT) that TUPE will apply to transfer employees when a company goes into administration, including on a pre-pack administration. This decision overturns the leading case of Oakland v Wellswood (Yorkshire) Ltd, which found that TUPE did not apply to "pre-packs".

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Debt, Liquidation, Precondition, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Employment Appeal Tribunal
    Authors:
    Alex Denny , Victoria Pengelly
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
    Lehman Brothers flip clause appeal set to be heard before UK Supreme Court
    2011-03-01

    Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc.’s pending appeal against the judgments of the UK High Court and the Court of Appeal in the so called “flip clause cases”, concerning the enforceability of flip clauses, is scheduled to be begin with Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited (Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc (UKSC 2009/0222)) on March 1, 2011.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Climate change mitigation, Option (finance), Facebook, Lehman Brothers, Trustee, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice (England & Wales), UK Supreme Court
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP
    When trade finance meets insolvency
    2011-03-04

    There has been an upturn in the frequency of trade finance workouts, restructurings and formal insolvencies. Susan Moore and Luci Mitchell-Fry look at some key issues that banks face when trade finance lending passes to "bad bank".

    The bank's decisions at every stage of a trade finance transaction are critical: at origination; when following a workout/restructuring; and once a formal insolvency process becomes a reality.

    Origination

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Credit risk, Liquidation, Payment protection insurance
    Authors:
    Susan Moore , Luci Mitchell-Fry
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    DWP to consult on Section 75 relaxations
    2011-02-04

    Section 75 of the Pensions Act 1995 has the potential to mean that, as a result of corporate restructuring (including on employee and TUPE transfers), an employer that participates in a defined benefit occupational pension scheme could have to make a one-off payment (a debt) to the scheme. The debt reflects the difference between the scheme funds that are available and the estimated cost of securing all scheme benefits in the form of annuity policies.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, MacRoberts LLP, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Life annuity, Defined benefit pension plan, Department for Work and Pensions (UK), Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Pensions Act 1995 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Trotter , Martyn Shaw
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    MacRoberts LLP
    Changes to procedure of dealing with the family home by official receiver
    2011-02-09

    From 1 January 2011 the Insolvency Service has put the following changes into effect:

    The Official Receiver (OR), as trustee of the bankruptcy estate, will no longer dispose of a bankrupt’s interest in a family home until two years and three months after the bankruptcy order is made, except if an offer is received which is in the creditors’ interests to accept.

    At two years and three months a review will begin. In cases where the bankrupt’s interest in the property is valued at less than £1,000, steps will be taken to revest the property interest in the bankrupt.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP, Bankruptcy, Interest, Mortgage loan, Trustee
    Authors:
    Graham Phillips
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP
    Dealing with a section 75 debt - apportionment and withdrawal arrangements
    2011-02-14

    When an employer leaves a multi-employer defined benefit pension scheme, an employer debt - a section 75 debt - may arise if the scheme was underfunded.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Debt, Defined benefit pension plan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1942
    • Page 1943
    • Page 1944
    • Page 1945
    • Current page 1946
    • Page 1947
    • Page 1948
    • Page 1949
    • Page 1950
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days