Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Distinctions with a difference: comparison of restructurings under the CCAA with Chapter 11 law and practice
    2011-09-26

    introduction

    In Canada legislative authority is divided between the federal and provincial governments by subject matter. "Bankruptcy and insolvency" is a matter of federal jurisdiction, while "property and civil rights" is generally within the jurisdiction of the provinces.

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, McMillan LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Income tax, Liquidation, Unemployment benefits, Secured creditor, US Federal Government, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Canada Pension Plan Act 1985, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    McMillan LLP
    Spotlight on security documents: the landlord waiver
    2011-09-30

    Having enforceable security over all of a borrower’s assets is obviously of primary importance to a lender.  However, where a borrower occupies leased premises, ensuring the lender has quick and reliable access to the collateral is equally important, especially if the landlord proves to be unco-operative after a borrower’s default.  Although court-ordered access to a borrower’s leased premises can be sought after a borrower’s loan default, a landlord waiver obtained prior to an initial advance of a loan can bring some added certainty to the realization process outside of a bankrup

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Gowling WLG, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Landlord, Leasehold estate, Waiver, Consent, Personal property, Default (law), Default (finance)
    Authors:
    Richard C. Dusome
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    CRA getting aggressive in asserting deemed trust over mortgage proceeds
    2011-05-16

    Unremitted source deductions are subject to a deemed trust in favour of the Crown under Section 227 of the Income Tax Act (the “ITA”), Section 86 of theEmployment Insurance Act (the “EIA”) and Section 23 of the Canada Pension Plan (the “CPP”). Subsection 227(4) of the ITA creates the trust for income tax deductions and Subsection 227(4.1) creates a super-priority lien in favour of the Crown, in the amount of the trust, over all the debtor’s assets.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Interest, Debt, Mortgage loan, Personal property, Excise, Unemployment benefits, Canada Revenue Agency, Canada Pension Plan Act 1985, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Income-Tax Act 1961 (India)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP
    Rights of set-off in insolvency
    2011-05-18

    When a company winds up, begins restructuring proceedings or goes bankrupt, a debtor or creditor may be able to cancel out the amount payable to the other party by using the remedy of “set‐off”. Set‐off involves the cancelling of crossliabilities between two parties who owe each other money. It is a valuable tool that can increase a creditor’s percentage of recovery and decrease the debt burden of a debtor.

    Types of Set‐off: Contractual, Legal or Equitable

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Consideration, Debt, Common law
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    The Open for Business Act: Bill 68 – An act to promote Ontario as open for business by amending or repealing certain acts - enacted as: Chapter 16 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2010
    2011-05-19

    Bill 68 – An Act to promote Ontario as open for business by amending or repealing
    certain Acts (the “Open for Business Act”)1 received Royal Assent on October 25,
    2010. It is an omnibus Act which contains more than 100 amendments to existing
    legislation spread out across 10 ministries.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Banking, Company & Commercial, Construction, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Dentons, Constitutional amendment
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Comments on the Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark insolvency decision in Ted LeRoy Trucking
    2011-05-20

    The Supreme Court of Canada decision in Century Services Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), which arose from the restructuring proceedings of Ted LeRoy Trucking Ltd. and was released on December 6, 2010, is a landmark decision in Canadian insolvency law.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Statutory interpretation, Debt, Liquidation, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Kevin P. McElcheran , Heather L. Meredith
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Taking a second look at lessors’ risk in airline insolvencies in Canada
    2011-05-27

    On April 6, 2011, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released its decision in the priority disputes between the lessors and aviation authorities resulting from the Skyservice receivership. The Court, in interpreting and applying the decisions in Canada 3000 and Zoom Airlines, may have raised the bar for lessors to defeat the seizure and detention rights of the aviation authorities in Canada.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Aviation, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Ex parte, Airport, Net asset value, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
    Corporations in receivership and the right to counsel
    2011-06-08

    In the recent case of Peterborough (City) v. Kawartha Native Housing Society, the Ontario Court of Appeal was asked to determine:

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP, Costs in English law, Board of directors, Affordable housing, Right to counsel, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP
    Court of Appeal defines directors’ authority in a receivership
    2011-06-09

    Are the directors of a corporation which has been placed into receivership entitled to retain counsel on behalf of the corporation without prior approval of the Receiver or the court?

    According to a recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, the answer is “Yes”.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Board of directors, Interest, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    David Ward
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    The CCAA scene: recent and notable - June 2011
    2011-06-09

    Adananc

    On February 28, 2011, Adanac Molybdenum Corporation announced that it successfully implemented its plan of compromise and arrangement and emerged from CCAA protection. It was announced that, on implementation, Adanac’s outstanding common shares were consolidated on a 150 to 1 basis with 24,698,888 post-consolidation common shares issued to creditors.

    Adanac owns the Ruby Creek Project, located in northwest British Columbia.

    Ambrilia Biopharma

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Medical device, Subsidiary, Ericsson, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Alex Tarantino
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1562
    • Page 1563
    • Page 1564
    • Page 1565
    • Current page 1566
    • Page 1567
    • Page 1568
    • Page 1569
    • Page 1570
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days