Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Foreign liquidators of unregistered foreign companies
    2011-03-21

    Introduction

    The Singapore High Court has confirmed that it will recognize the status and powers of a foreign liquidator in the liquidation of an unregistered foreign company in Singapore.

    Life cycle of a company

    Statistics from the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority ("ACRA") of Singapore reveal that the increasing number of companies formed in Singapore (2004:17,151; 2009:26,414) is matched by a corresponding increase in the number of companies ceasing operations (2004:5,882; 2009:22,388).

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Rodyk & Davidson LLP, Share (finance), Bond (finance), Shareholder, Security (finance), Option (finance), Debt, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Tax haven, Subsidiary, Singapore Exchange, Companies Act, Singapore High Court
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Rodyk & Davidson LLP
    Parliament passes Insurance (Amendment) Bill 20112011: dealing with distressed insurers
    2011-04-28

    The Insurance (Amendment) Bill 2011 (the "Bill") was passed in Parliament on 11 April 2011.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Allen & Gledhill LLP
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Allen & Gledhill LLP
    Unfair preference: what constitutes proper commercial considerations
    2011-05-03

    Introduction

    An unfair preference transaction will only be voided under the Companies Act if it is influenced by a desire to prefer the receiving party in the event of insolvency, and not if it is motivated by proper commercial considerations. In Tam Chee Chong and another v DBS Bank Ltd [2010] SGHC 331, the Singapore High Court had the opportunity to consider what constitutes proper commercial considerations.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Rajah & Tann Asia, Share (finance), Consideration, Debt, Singapore High Court
    Authors:
    Chua Beng Chye
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Rajah & Tann Asia
    Arbitration
    2011-06-30

    Where a plaintiff sought to claw-back payments made to the defendant on the basis that they amounted to an unfair preference, or a transaction at an undervalue, or had been made with intent to defraud, held that such a claim could not be arbitrated but had to be dealt with in court proceedings:

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, WongPartnership LLP, Fraud
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    WongPartnership LLP
    Progen Holdings Ltd to refund S$18 million payment
    2010-10-01

    Lee Eng Beng SC, Nigel Pereira and Jonathan Lee from the Business Finance and Insolvency Practice of Rajah & Tann LLP successfully represented the Appellant in Chee Yoh Chuang and Anor (as Liquidators of Progen Engineering Pte Ltd) v Progen Holdings Ltd [2010] SGCA 31.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Rajah & Tann Asia, Limited liability partnership
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Rajah & Tann Asia
    Insolvency
    2010-10-04

    Payments made by a company to its holding company shortly before its winding up were held to have amounted to an unfair preference of the holding company and could be clawed-back from it

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, WongPartnership LLP, Liquidation, Holding company
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    WongPartnership LLP
    Insolvency disputes not arbitrable in Singapore
    2010-10-05

    The Singapore High Court has considered for the first time whether an action brought to avoid transactions that allegedly violated insolvency laws should be stayed in favour of arbitration. The court held that such disputes are not suitable for arbitration due to the public interest involved.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Fraud, Liquidation, Singapore High Court
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Schemes of arrangement over a company do not release its joint debtors
    2010-10-14

    In Econ Piling Ltd v Sambo E&C Pte Ltd [2010] SGHC 120, the Singapore High Court rejected the proposition that where a debtor is released from its debts, its other joint-debtors are also automatically released.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Rajah & Tann Asia, Debtor, Debt, Singapore High Court
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Rajah & Tann Asia
    Singapore Court of Appeal allows claw back of payments made to holding company on grounds of unfair preference even though payments were alleged to be part of established past practice
    2010-10-27

    The Singapore Court of Appeal decision of Chee Yoh Chuang & Anor (as Liquidators of Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (in liquidation)) v Progen Holdings Ltd considered how the lawought to balance the rights of creditorswith the companies directors' desire to keep the company afloat when the company has financial difficulties and when payments were made to creditors.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Allen & Gledhill LLP, Liquidation, Holding company, Court of Appeal of Singapore
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Allen & Gledhill LLP
    Singapore High Court orders application for creditors' meeting to approve scheme of arrangement to be heard with winding up application against company
    2010-10-27

    In an application by Win-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd (the
    “Company”) pursuant to section 210 of the Companies Act, the Company
    sought an order to convene a meeting of creditors for the purposes of
    approving a scheme of arrangement.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Allen & Gledhill LLP, Liquidation, Singapore High Court
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Allen & Gledhill LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1494
    • Page 1495
    • Page 1496
    • Page 1497
    • Current page 1498
    • Page 1499
    • Page 1500
    • Page 1501
    • Page 1502
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days