The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has amended the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Fast Track Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2017 with effect from February 7, 2018, and has brought into force the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Fast Track Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2018[1]. The salient features of the new regulations have been discussed hereunder.
Appointment of registered valuers
Enforced with the objective of time-bound insolvency resolution and maximization of assets, the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “IBC”), in order to facilitate the process of insolvency resolution, has provision for appointment of an insolvency resolution professional (hereinafter referred to as “IRP”).
It is known that I & B Code came into effect from 01.12.2016. Subsequently, it perspired during various proceedings in NCLT that it has no specific provision for limitation period and/or categorical applicability of Limitation Act on initiation of insolvency process under the Act.
However, the limitation period is prescribed under the Limitation Act for every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and application made under the law.
As per Section 5(14) of the IB Code "Insolvency Resolution Process Period" is 180 days.
“Period of one hundred and eighty days beginning from the insolvency commencement date and ending on one hundred and eightieth day;”
COMPLETION OF INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS - It must be noted that Section 12 of the IB Code prescribes the time limit for completion of Insolvency Resolution process.
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has held that ‘Moratorium’ under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code will not only be applicable to the property of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ but also on its ‘Personal Guarantor’.
Brief Facts:
Background:
The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court on February 2, 2018, upheld the validity of Section 7, 8 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred as ‘IBC 2016’ or ‘the Code’) in the case of Akshay Jhunjhunwala & anr. v. Union of India[1].
Introduction –
Introduction –
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NCLT’), in the case of Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (herein after referred to as AARCL) vs Hotel Gaudavan Pvt. Ltd (herein after referred to as HGPL)[1], entertained the first resolution plan filed before it, which was the first to have been submitted since the implementation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
FACTS
Hamera International Private Limited executed an agreement with, Macquarie Bank Limited, Singapore (hereinafter called ‘appellant’), where the appellant purchased the original supplier's right, title and interest in a supply agreement in favour of Shilpi Cable Technologies (hereinafter referred to as the “respondent”).
Background: