Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    IBC - Savior for Employees
    2018-04-18

    Employees as Operational Creditor

    The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “Code”) considers all employees and workmen as operational creditors.

    Operational Creditor is defined under Section 5 (20) of the IB Code as:

    "Operational creditor"means a person to whom an operational debt is owed and includes any person to whom such debt has been legally assigned or transferred;”

    Filed under:
    India, Company & Commercial, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, AMLEGALS
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    AMLEGALS
    Insolvency in NCLT - defects, listing & admission of an application
    2018-04-20

    TIME LIMIT FOR RECTIFICATION AND ADMISSION IS DIRECTORY 

    It is pertinent to note that Section 9 (5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 provides the time limit for admission and rejection of the application and also the time limit for rectification of the defect in the application:

    SECTION 9(5)

    “Section 9 (5) – The Adjudicating Authority shall, within fourteen days of the receipt of the application under sub-section (2), by an order—

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, AMLEGALS
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    AMLEGALS
    The Black Hole of Interim Finance under Insolvency and Restructuring Regime
    2018-02-15

    Companies undergoing corporate insolvency resolution process tend to be in dire need of funds to meet their working capital expenses. Interim finance can be an important tool for effective reorganization so as to prevent liquidation.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, AZB & Partners
    Authors:
    Bahram N. Vakil
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    AZB & Partners
    All roads lead to IBC - RBI stressed assets framework merges with debt resolution under the insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016
    2018-02-22

    Background

    Filed under:
    India, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Khaitan & Co, Debtor, Debt, Reserve Bank of India, Securities and Exchange Board of India
    Authors:
    Kumar Saurabh Singh , Ashwin Bishnoi , Rajeev Vidhani , Krishnendu Sen , Meenakshi Kurpad
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Khaitan & Co
    India: Amendments in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Fast Track Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations
    2018-03-06

    The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has amended the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Fast Track Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2017 with effect from February 7, 2018, and has brought into force the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Fast Track Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2018[1]. The salient features of the new regulations have been discussed hereunder.

    Appointment of registered valuers

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, SS Rana & Co, Bankruptcy
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    SS Rana & Co
    India: Role of Insolvency Resolution Professionals appointed under IBC
    2018-03-22

    Enforced with the objective of time-bound insolvency resolution and maximization of assets, the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “IBC”), in order to facilitate the process of insolvency resolution, has provision for appointment of an insolvency resolution professional (hereinafter referred to as “IRP”).

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, SS Rana & Co
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    SS Rana & Co
    Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code Via Limitation Act
    2018-03-27

    It is known that I & B Code came into effect from 01.12.2016.  Subsequently, it perspired during various proceedings in NCLT that it has no specific provision for limitation period and/or categorical applicability of Limitation Act on initiation of insolvency process under the Act.

    However, the limitation period is prescribed under the Limitation Act for every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and application made under the law.

    Filed under:
    India, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, AMLEGALS
    Authors:
    Anandaday Misshra
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    AMLEGALS
    Time Lines In Insolvency Process - Identification Of Resolution Applicants Within 105 Days
    2018-04-04

    As per Section 5(14) of the IB Code "Insolvency Resolution Process Period" is 180 days.

    “Period of one hundred and eighty days beginning from the insolvency commencement date and ending on one hundred and eightieth day;”

    COMPLETION OF INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS - It must be noted that Section 12 of the IB Code prescribes the time limit for completion of Insolvency Resolution process.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, AMLEGALS
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    AMLEGALS
    Insolvency - ‘Moratorium’ applicable to property of ‘Personal Guarantor’
    2018-04-05

    National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has held that ‘Moratorium’ under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code will not only be applicable to the property of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ but also on its ‘Personal Guarantor’.

    Brief Facts:

    Filed under:
    India, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys
    India: Calcutta High Court upholds the constitutionality of the provisions of IBC, 2016
    2018-04-10

    Background:

    The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court on February 2, 2018, upheld the validity of Section 7, 8 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred as ‘IBC 2016’ or ‘the Code’) in the case of Akshay Jhunjhunwala & anr. v. Union of India[1].

    Filed under:
    India, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, SS Rana & Co
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    SS Rana & Co

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 67
    • Page 68
    • Page 69
    • Page 70
    • Current page 71
    • Page 72
    • Page 73
    • Page 74
    • Page 75
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days