Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    New Illinois legislation may help curb fraudulent lien filings by disgruntled debtors
    2012-10-12

    Disgruntled debtors seeking to evade their obligations by filing fraudulent liens soon face new threats under Illinois law. On July 25, 2012, Governor Patrick Quinn approved and signed Senate Bill 1692, which is intended to provide additional remedies for wrongfully filed UCC liens.5 Senate Bill 1692 becomes effective January 1, 2013 and will be incorporated into section nine of the Illinois Uniform Commercial Code. 

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Debtor, Fraud, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    Courtney M. Ofosu
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dykema Gossett PLLC
    “Strong arm” powers Round 3: what happens if a mortgage is recorded before a deed?
    2012-09-20

    Olsen v. Heaver (In re Heaver), 473 B.R. 734 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2012) –

    The short story is that when a deed and mortgage are executed at the same time, but the mortgage is recorded before the deed, the recorded mortgage does not provide constructive notice and can be avoided in a bankruptcy – at least under Illinois law as interpreted by the Heaver bankruptcy court.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Mortgage loan, Deed, Conveyancing, Constructive notice, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company placed into rehabilitation: what you should be doing to protect and prepare to assert your claims
    2012-07-30

    On July 2, 2012, the Illinois Department of Insurance (IDOI) entered an Agreed Order of Rehabilitation against Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company and American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, which is the part of the Lumbermens Mutual Group formerly known as Kemper (collectively, “Lumbermens”). Under the order, IDOI’s Director will serve as Lumbermens’ Rehabilitator with powers to restructure Lumbermens’ insurance business. From this point forward, Lumbermens will no longer take on any new insurance obligations, issue any new policies, or renew any existing policies.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    Authors:
    Michael David Lichtenstein
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    Lumbermens enters rehabilitation: what are the consequences for its policyholders?
    2012-07-13

    Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company and American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company (part of the Lumbermens Mutual Group and formerly known as Kemper) (“Lumbermens”), after years of struggling financially under the supervision of the Illinois Department of Insurance, recently entered rehabilitation proceedings. Policyholders who purchased workers’ compensation and other types of insurance from Lumbermens should be aware that many opportunities for recovery remain.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Letter of credit, Dividends
    Authors:
    James M. Davis , Timothy P. Law , Thomas A. Marrinson , John D. Shugrue , Paul Walker-Bright , Laura M. Geiger
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    In re Crane: update on appellate and legislative efforts to clarify Illinois mortgage requirements
    2012-07-11

    In February the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois held in Crane v.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Husch Blackwell LLP, Interest, Amicus curiae, Mortgage loan, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Phillip J.F. Geheb , Courtney L. Hill
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
    Bankruptcy court decision in Illinois holds that mortgage can be avoided because of failure to include loan terms in mortgage document
    2012-05-22

    In In re Crane, the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois recently held that a mortgage can be avoided in bankruptcy if it fails to include the maturity date and the interest rate of the underlying debt within the mortgage document. The court found that failing to include these loan terms on the face of the mortgage as recorded, violated the requirements of Illinois conveyancing statutes, and therefore did not provide the constructive notice to the trustee necessary for preventing the avoidance.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Mortgage loan, Conveyancing, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Daniel J. Slattery
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Bankruptcy court in Illinois holds that a mortgage is avoidable in bankruptcy if the mortgage as recorded does not state the maturity date and interest rate of the underlying debt
    2012-05-15

    In a decision that potentially has serious implications for mortgage financing transactions in Illinois, the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois recently held that a mortgage is avoidable in bankruptcy if it fails to include the maturity date and the interest rate of the underlying debt within the mortgage document as recorded. In re Crane, Case No. 11-90592, U.S. Dist. Ct. C.D. Ill., February 29, 2012; Supplemental Opinion and Order, April 5, 2012.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Mortgage loan, Maturity (finance), Conveyancing, Constructive notice, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Daniel J. Slattery
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Do you know where your cross-collateral clause is?
    2012-04-19

    In the recent decision in In Re Duckworth (March 22, 2012), the Chief Bankruptcy Judge for the Central District of Illinois issued a decision that may have far reaching effects on some lenders using automated loan documentation software1. In this case, the State Bank of Toulon (the “Bank”) generated loan documents for a $1.1 million agricultural loan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lathrop GPM, Collateral (finance)
    Authors:
    George E. Meinz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lathrop GPM
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court holds Illinois mortgage may be avoided for failure to state interest rate and maturity date
    2012-04-20

    In a ruling on February 29, 2012, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois allowed a bankruptcy trustee to avoid an Illinois mortgage as to other creditors of the estate because the mortgage failed to expressly state the maturity date of and interest rate on the underlying debt (In Re Crane, Case 11-90592, U.S. Dist Ct, C.D. IL, February 29, 2012).

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Debt, Mortgage loan, Maturity (finance), Title insurance, Constructive notice, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Michael S. Kurtzon , Gary P. Segal , Diana Tsai
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dykema Gossett PLLC
    Illinois mortgages subject to avoidance in bankruptcy absent strict adherence to Illinois mortgage statute
    2012-04-20

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois recently held that an Illinois mortgage is subject to avoidance in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 544(a)(3) unless the mortgage contains among other things, (i) the amount of the debt, (ii) the maturity date of the debt, and (iii) the underlying interest rate. Richardson v. The Gifford State Bank (In re Crane), Adv. Pro. No. 11-9067 (Bankr. C.D. Ill.).

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Bankruptcy, Mortgage loan, Maturity (finance), Constructive notice, US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Michael Campbell , John T. Gregg , Patrick E. Mears
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Barnes & Thornburg LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Current page 10
    • Page 11
    • Page 12
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days