Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Court permits successive notices of intention to appoint an administrator - but warns of sanctions for abuse
    2010-05-13

    His Honour Judge Purle QC in Re Cornercare Limited [2010] EWHC 393 (CH) has clarified English law on the filing of successive notices of intention to appoint administrators. He has held that there is nothing in the relevant provisions of the Insolvency Act 1986 ("IA 1986") to prevent the filing of successive notices of intention to appoint administrators, where the original notice of intention to appoint an administrator had not been acted upon for good reason.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells, Debtor, Landlord, Abuse of process, Moratorium (law), Asset forfeiture, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Joe Bannister , Daniel Norris , Mathew Ditchburn
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Munich I Regional Court declares Wirecard’s annual financial statements null and void - what happens now?
    2022-05-10

    Wirecard's insolvency administrator has won a first victory before the Munich I Regional Court. On 5 May, the court declared the annual financial statements for 2017 and 2018, which show balance sheet profits totalling around EUR 600 million, null and void. Dividends of around EUR 47 million were distributed to Wirecard's shareholders from these profits, which probably never existed. As a consequence of the nullity of the annual accounts, the resolutions on the utilisation of the balance sheet profits are also null and void.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Too little too latte: Challenge to Caffé Nero CVA fails at its final hearing
    2021-09-29

    The High Court has dismissed an application by a landlord creditor to overturn a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) implemented by coffee shop chain Caffé Nero. The CVA, previously approved by its creditors, compromised rent arrears and reduced future rents for the company's premises. The decision follows a series of previous high-profile challenges to retail and leisure CVAs.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Hogan Lovells
    Authors:
    Mathew Ditchburn
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Doing business in the United States 2021
    2021-01-15

    Doing business in the United States

    2021

    2

    Hogan Lovells

    Doing business in the United States 2021

    3

    Contents

    Introduction1

    I.Openness of U.S. markets to foreign investment

    2

    II.Direct or indirect market entry and choice of entity

    8

    III. Commercial contracting

    20

    IV.Labor and employment law considerations

    26

    V.Immigration laws

    34

    VI.Intellectual property laws

    40

    VII. Export control and economic sanction laws

    46

    VIII. U.S. antitrust laws

    56

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Company & Commercial, Competition & Antitrust, Copyrights, Corporate Finance/M&A, Designs and trade secrets, Employment & Labor, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Immigration, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Patents, Trade & Customs, Trademarks, White Collar Crime, Hogan Lovells, Medicare, Bribery, Corporate governance, Money laundering, Due diligence, Non-disclosure agreement, Cybersecurity, Coronavirus, Personal protective equipment, Fair Labor Standards Act 1938 (USA), Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 (USA), CARES Act 2020 (USA), Internal Revenue Service (USA), US Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Trade Commission (USA), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (USA), US Department of Justice, Office of Foreign Assets Control (USA), US DoL, NLRB, Microsoft, Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Second time lucky: pre-pack reform in the UK
    2020-10-28

    On 8 October 2020, the Insolvency Service published the outcome of its review of industry reforms to pre-pack sales in administration and made recommendations which will impact the way in which pre-pack sales to connected parties in particular operate in the UK in the future.

    Speed read

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Hogan Lovells
    Authors:
    James Maltby , Naomi Parmar
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Arbitrating against a distressed or insolvent party
    2020-06-23

     

    Although the challenges brought by the COVID-19 pandemic have, and continue to, put exceptional pressure on supply chains, the reality is that the insolvency of a business partner is a risk even in normal times. When that business partner is on the other side of pending arbitration proceedings, questions arise as to how the insolvency affects the substantive claim as well as the underlying procedure.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Hogan Lovells, Coronavirus
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Impact on M&A and corporate (Singapore)
    2020-04-21

    Overview of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market in Singapore

    Singapore was one of the first countries outside of China to encounter the virus. Whilst deal activity was down on the prior year, M&A transactions were still happening with sectors such as e-commerce and renewable energy appearing attractive. The impact on M&A activity for the second quarter of 2020 isn't clear at present but restricted mobility will certainly impact transactions, with site visits being all but impossible.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Hogan Lovells, Corporate governance, Force majeure, Coronavirus, Monetary Authority of Singapore
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    COVID-19: Aussetzung der Insolvenzantragspflicht & weitere Regelungen
    2020-03-26

    Gesetz zur Abmilderung der Folgen der COVID-19 Pandemie

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Hogan Lovells, Bankruptcy, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    Heiko Tschauner , Dr. Susann Brackmann , Dr. Maximilian Baier
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    A welcome red packet - Hong Kong court recognizes mainland Chinese administrators for first time
    2020-01-20

    Just in time for the Chinese New Year, a Hong Kong court has taken a major step forward in the developing law on cross-border insolvency by recognizing a mainland Chinese liquidation for the first time. In the Joint and Several Liquidators of CEFC Shanghai International Group Ltd [2020] HKCFI 167, Mr. Justice Harris granted recognition and assistance to mainland administrators in Hong Kong so they could perform their functions and protect assets held in Hong Kong from enforcement.

    Filed under:
    Hong Kong, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells, Debtor, Investment funds, House of Lords
    Authors:
    Chris Dobby , Nigel Sharman , Karen Chan , Jonathan Leitch , Byron Phillips
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Mission Product: Trademarks? Yes. Mootness? No
    2019-06-04

    In Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), the Supreme Court held that a debtor’s rejection of a trademark license does not eliminate the licensee’s right to use the trademark through the completion of the contract, settling a split in the Circuits. The Supreme Court also ruled that the case was not moot, despite the bankruptcy estate’s distribution of all of its assets, which may have important implications for the developing jurisprudence on mootness in bankruptcy cases.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Hogan Lovells, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, US Congress
    Authors:
    Ronald Silverman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 71
    • Page 72
    • Page 73
    • Page 74
    • Current page 75
    • Page 76
    • Page 77
    • Page 78
    • Page 79
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days