Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Delaware Supreme Court limits scope of “zone of insolvency” fiduciary duties
    2007-10-01

    In a significant Delaware law decision regarding creditors’ ability to sue corporate fiduciaries, the Delaware Supreme Court recently addressed the issue of whether a corporate director owes fiduciary duties to the creditors of a company that is insolvent or in the “zone of insolvency.” In North American Catholic Educ. Programming Found., Inc. v. Gheewalla, the court concluded that directors of a solvent Delaware corporation that is operating in the zone of insolvency owe their fiduciary duties to the corporation and its shareholders, and not creditors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Shareholder, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Good faith, Involuntary dismissal, Stakeholder (corporate), Business judgement rule, Delaware General Corporation Law, Goldman Sachs, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Delaware Supreme Court rules against creditors’ ability to bring direct breach of fiduciary duty suits against directors of corporations which are insolvent or are in the zone of insolvency
    2007-07-27

    On May 18, 2007, in North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Gheewalla (“Gheewalla”),1 the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision2 in which the Court of Chancery precluded creditors from filing direct suits for breach of fiduciary duty against directors of corporations that are either in the zone of insolvency or are actually insolvent. With its decision, the Delaware Supreme Court has limited creditors’ ability to sue directors for breach of fiduciary duty.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Accounting, Personal jurisdiction, Standing (law), Goldman Sachs, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court, Court of equity
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    White & Case LLP
    BP in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon incident and the bankruptcy implications of mounting environmental liabilities
    2010-07-07

    On April 20, 2010, an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil drilling rig located off the coast of Louisiana killed eleven crewmen and set off what is now considered the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history. As a result, BP p.l.c. (“BP”), the parent company of the British Petroleum multinational corporation, faces mounting liabilities related to the damages caused by the disaster and hundreds of lawsuits that have been filed in numerous U.S. state and federal courts.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Pollution, Bankruptcy, Injunction, Liability (financial accounting), Public limited company, Subsidiary, Gross negligence, Goldman Sachs
    Authors:
    Richard Nevins , Gregory M. Petrick , Peter M. Friedman , Ingrid Bagby
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Southern district moots appeal of general growth dip financing
    2010-06-15

    The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently addressed an objection to the debtor-in-possession financing approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in the bankruptcy of General Growth Properties.1 The District Court’s decision, which holds that reversal on appeal of an order approving DIP financing does not invalidate the financing or liens granted by the postpetition lenders, if provided in good faith also addresses both the timeliness of the appeal and the merits of the arguments raised therein, provides a detai

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Debt, Good faith, Secured loan, Goldman Sachs, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Joseph Zujkowski
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Delaware's choice-of-law analysis as provided in a decision in PMTS Liquidating Corp., which partially granted a motion to dismiss
    2011-08-01

    Summary

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Fraud, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Federal Reporter, Liquidation, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), Goldman Sachs, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Supplier's rights under S. 81.1 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act expanded
    2009-04-29

    Section 81.1 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) grants a temporary super priority to suppliers who provided goods to a bankrupt purchaser or where a receiver has been appointed in relation to the purchaser. The section requires the supplier to provide a written demand to the purchaser and allows the supplier to repossess the goods within thirty days of the date of the delivery of goods.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Secured creditor, Unsecured creditor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Goldman Sachs
    Authors:
    David LeGeyt , David W. Mann
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Judgment on Lehman client money
    2009-12-21

    On 1 May 2009, the administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ("LBIE") applied to the English High Court for directions on certain issues relating to "Client Money" (as defined in the UK Financial Services Authority's Client Assets Rules, the "CASS Rules") held by LBIE. LBIE was regulated by the FSA and was required to comply with the CASS Rules.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Credit (finance), Security (finance), Holding company, Broker-dealer, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Stephen Gale
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Current page 3
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days