Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Chrysler asset sale approved
    2009-08-26

    On May 31, 2009, approximately 30 days after Chrysler Group LLC and affiliated debtors filed for bankruptcy relief, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York authorized the sale of substantially all of Chrysler’s assets to “New Chrysler” – an entity formed by Chrysler and Fiat Automobiles SpA and initially majority-owned by Chrysler’s Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (VEBA) – free and clear of liens, claims and encumbrances under section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Fiat Transaction).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Fiduciary, Consideration, Due process, Liquidation, Good faith, United Automobile Workers, Chrysler, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Elliot M. Smith
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Bankruptcy CSI: did the CEO leave evidence of wrongdoing?
    2016-01-18

    When is there sufficient evidence to hold that a fiduciary’s debt to an ERISA benefit plan is non-dischargeable in bankruptcy?  The Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York recently held in In re Kern, Case No. 13-08096 (Dec.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Fiduciary
    Authors:
    Peter R. Morrison
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    MF Global: the in pari delicto defense is alive and well
    2015-06-15

    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC (PwC) won another victory in the MF Global litigation when the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of claims brought by former commodities customers (the “Customers”) of MF Global Inc. (“MFGI”). This holding is important for its clear affirmation of the in pari delicto doctrine and as a visible limitation on claims by parties not in privity.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Fiduciary
    Authors:
    Kristin E. Richner
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Seventh Circuit makes life tougher for directors with conflicts
    2011-04-27

    In a decision released on March 29, 2011, CDX Liquidating Trust v. Venrock Assocs., et al., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 6390 (7th Cir. March 29, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, reversing the district court’s ruling, held that a director’s disclosure of a conflict, in and of itself, is insufficient to protect that director from liability for breach of fiduciary duty or disloyalty arising from that conflict.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Conflict of interest, Corporate governance, Shareholder, Debtor, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Interest, Venture capital, Liquidation, Preferred stock, Bridge loan, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Stephen D. Lerner , Jeffrey A. Marks , Sandra E. Mayerson , Peter A. Zisser
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Putting the brakes on derivative standing for lenders and other creditors of Delaware limited liability companies
    2011-04-06

    In 2007, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an important ruling for creditors of insolvent corporations. It held that such creditors had standing to assert derivative claims for breaches of fiduciary duties against directors of an insolvent corporation.1 But, as the Delaware Court of Chancery recently made clear, there is a big difference between Delaware limited liability companies (LLCs) and their corporate cousins.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Debtor, Fiduciary, Limited liability company, Standing (law), Limited partnership, Derivative suit, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court, Court of equity
    Authors:
    Elliot M. Smith
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    New York Court of Appeals maintains status quo on imputation, in pari delicto defenses
    2011-04-06

    On October 21, 2010, the New York Court of Appeals (the Appeals Court), New York’s highest appellate court, addressed two appeals, and then issued an important ruling regarding the parameters of the affirmative defense of in pari delicto in suits against outside auditors, holding that the doctrines of in pari delicto and imputation are a complete bar to recovery when the corporate wrongdoer’s actions are imputed to the company.

    The Doctrines of In Pari Delicto and Imputation

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Fraud, Fiduciary, Interest, Misconduct, Negligence, Common law, Malpractice, KPMG
    Authors:
    Kristin E. Richner
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Closing a loophole, confirming market practice
    2015-04-24

    Jetivia S.A. and another v Bilta (UK) Limited (in liquidation) and others [2015] UKSC 23

    Insolvency practitioners and creditors alike will welcome the decision handed down by the Supreme Court on 22 April 2015. It reduces the wiggle room given to delinquent directors of insolvent companies when claims are brought against them, and confirms the extra-territorial effect of claims against third parties under the fraudulent trading provisions in section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (the “Act”).

    Background & Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Fiduciary, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Mark Lawford
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Sponsor/owner series: initial considerations when your company is heading toward distress—fiduciary duties and more
    2015-03-31

    Anyone investing equity in an enterprise, whether creating a start-up or purchasing an established company, is a natural optimist.  The hope is that the business will continue to perform well and yield its owners substantial profits year-after-year (and then maybe a hefty return upon exit).  But, as those of us in restructuring know, not every company enjoys positive returns all the time.  Businesses go through down cycles for different reasons – whether it be the overall economic climate (think 2008), issues specific to a particular industry (think dropping oil prices), a gr

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Fiduciary
    Authors:
    Ronit J. Berkovich , Andriana Georgallas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    The cycle of fiduciary duties – owner/directors of solvent companies owe fiduciary duties only to themselves
    2014-12-17

    “Always look out for Number One, but don’t step in Number Two” – Rodney Dangerfield

    “What-eva – I’ll do what I want [as long as my company is solvent]” – Eric Cartman, South Park

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Fiduciary
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Slouching towards bankruptcy: corporate fiduciaries escape liability in Ultimate Escapes
    2014-12-16

    As a company turns in the widening gyre of financial distress, its directors and officers are often confronted with situations that require them to make difficult decisions. Should things fall apart, those decisions may give rise to claims that directors or officers breached their fiduciary duties to the company. A 

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Fiduciary, Business judgement rule, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Gabriel A. Morgan
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 31
    • Page 32
    • Page 33
    • Page 34
    • Current page 35
    • Page 36
    • Page 37
    • Page 38
    • Page 39
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days