Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Decision in Sierra Concrete Design, Inc. provides a thorough explanation of the principles behind bankruptcy's preference laws
    2012-01-16

    Summary

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Delaware's choice-of-law analysis as provided in a decision in PMTS Liquidating Corp., which partially granted a motion to dismiss
    2011-08-01

    Summary

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Fraud, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Federal Reporter, Liquidation, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), Goldman Sachs, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Decision in NEC Holdings Corp holds non-debtor environmental liabilities to be non-core
    2011-05-05

    Summary

    In a 5 page decision signed May 4, 2011, Judge Walsh of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court held that a proceeding initiated by a Debtor, seeking contribution relating to environmental claims is non-core. Judge Walsh’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Pollution, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Tangible property, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    VeraSun Energy files 199 avoidance actions in bankruptcy court
    2010-11-16

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Limited liability company, Commodity, Limited liability partnership, Debt, Liquidation, Subsidiary, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Caribbean Petroleum files for bankruptcy following explosion at petroleum tank farm
    2010-08-16

    On August 12, 2010, Caribbean Petroleum Corporation filed petitions for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Caribbean Petroleum imports and distributes petroleum products in Puerto Rico through a network of 184 service stations. This post will look at the events leading up to the company's filing for bankruptcy, as well as what the company hopes to accomplish while in bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, Chief financial officer
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Regent Communications files for bankruptcy, seeking to pay general unsecured claims in full
    2010-03-13

    Regent Communications, a radio broadcasting company that operates 62 stations throughout the U.S., filed chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions in the Delaware Bankruptcy Court on March 1, 2010.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Advertising, Debt, Secured loan, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Delaware bankruptcy court allows debtor to sidestep “make-whole” payment
    2015-07-21

    Bankruptcy Judge Christopher S. Sontchi recently ruled in the Energy Future Holdings case1 that the debtor will not be required to pay the $431 million “make whole” demanded by bondholders upon the debtor’s early payment of the bonds.2

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    RadioShack agrees to significant limitations in sale of customer data following pressure from state regulators and the FTC
    2015-06-03

    In what may become viewed as the de facto standard for selling customer information in bankruptcies, a Delaware bankruptcy court approved, on May 20, 2015, a multi-party agreement that would substantially limit RadioShack’s ability to sell 117 million customer records.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Federal Trade Commission (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court weighs in on limits to landlord’s lease rejection damages
    2015-05-26

    In In re Filene’s Basement, LLC,1 the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware considered the rejection damages a landlord claimant was entitled to pursuant to Section 502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code after the debtor rejected its lease as part of its reorganization plan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Alston & Bird LLP, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Lenders beware—Delaware Supreme Court states a UCC-3 filing is effective regardless of intent
    2014-11-19

    On October 17, 2014, the Delaware Supreme Court held that under the Delaware Uniform Commercial Code, the subjective intent of a secured party is irrelevant in determining the effectiveness of a UCC-3 termination statement if the secured party authorized its filing.[1]  

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), Delaware Supreme Court, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 150
    • Page 151
    • Page 152
    • Page 153
    • Current page 154
    • Page 155
    • Page 156
    • Page 157
    • Page 158
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days