Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Identifying and dealing with a financially troubled franchisee: what franchisors can do to prepare for a franchisee bankruptcy or receivership
    2008-05-09

    In the last issue of Franchise Alert, we discussed how to spot signs of franchisee financial distress at an early stage. Here, we present some steps franchisors can take to deal with financially distressed franchisees.

    Update Files

    Filed under:
    USA, Franchising, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Debtor, Accounts receivable, Consent, Due diligence, Franchise agreement, Precondition, Default (finance), Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Identifying and dealing with a financially troubled franchisee
    2008-04-18

    Part I: Spotting a Financially Troubled Franchisee in Time to Do Something about It

    Filed under:
    USA, Franchising, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Accounts receivable, Option (finance), Franchise agreement, Cashflow, Default (finance), Leverage (finance)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Unwinding the deal when bankruptcy looms
    2007-02-22

    Coping with the Insolvent Business Partner

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Punitive damages, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Injunction, Breach of contract, Joint venture, Liquidation, Due diligence, Default (finance), Leverage (finance), Distressed securities, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Assigned bankruptcy claims included right to collect cure amount
    2011-03-21

    REGEN CAPITAL I, INC. v. UAL CORP. (February 18, 2011)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Precondition, Default (finance), United Airlines, Indian National Congress, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    A&P -- direct showdown avoided on leasehold liens under dip financing order
    2011-01-18

    Can a debtor seeking debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) financing under Section 364 of the Bankruptcy Code grant a lender a lien on a leasehold interest in the face of an express anti-hypothecation provision in the underlying lease?

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Landlord, Leasehold estate, Interest, Default (finance), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Benjamin D. Feder
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    Court tosses life vest toTrico Marine Services
    2010-11-18

    Some legal commentators have lamented the extent to which lenders have been able to use debtor in possession (“DIP”) financing arrangements to gain control over an entire Chapter 11 case.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Market liquidity, Debt, Default (finance), Debtor in possession, Leverage (finance), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    Benjamin D. Feder
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    No abuse of discretion in refusing to reopen bankruptcy proceedings after four years
    2010-10-22

    REDMOND v. FIFTH THIRD BANK (October 20, 2010)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Bankruptcy, Debt, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Standard of review, Remand (court procedure), Default (finance), Prejudice, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    Withdrawal liability payments are not deferred pending arbitration when accelerated due to insolvency
    2010-09-17

    CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND v. O'NEILL BROS. TRANSFER & STORAGE (August 31, 2010)

    Filed under:
    USA, Arbitration & ADR, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Default (finance), Promulgation, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    UK Supreme Court rules in favour of flip clauses
    2011-08-08

    The UK Supreme Court, which is the UK's highest court, has handed down its long-awaited decision in Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc [2011] UKSC 38, in which the Court considered the validity and enforceability of so-called "flip" clauses under English bankruptcy law.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Clayton Utz, Bankruptcy, Surety, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Swap (finance), Good faith, Default (finance), Credit default swap, Lehman Brothers, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice, UK Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Andrew Jinks , Joshua Knuckey
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Clayton Utz
    US Bankruptcy Court flips English decision on flip clauses in Lehman Brothers case
    2010-02-05

    On 25 January 2010, the United States Bankruptcy Court handed down its much anticipated decision in relation to an action brought in that court by two Lehman Brothers entities (the Lehman entities) against BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited (BNY) (the US Decision).

    Filed under:
    Australia, USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Clayton Utz, Bankruptcy, Swap (finance), Default (finance), Title 11 of the US Code, Lehman Brothers, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    Australia, USA
    Firm:
    Clayton Utz

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 48
    • Page 49
    • Page 50
    • Page 51
    • Current page 52
    • Page 53
    • Page 54
    • Page 55
    • Page 56
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days