Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    The Dana NOL Trading Order: new protections for investors
    2007-10-04

    On August 9, 2006, Judge Burton R. Lifland of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York entered a Final Order Establishing Procedures for Trading in Claims and Equity Securities of Dana Corporation (the “Dana NOL Trading Order”). The Dana NOL Trading Order is materially different from NOL trading orders that have been approved by other bankruptcy courts and, from the perspective of investors in claims and distressed securities, represents a material improvement.

    Treatment of NOLs in Business Reorganizations

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Injunction, Security (finance), Taxable income, Economy, Market value, Distressed securities, Internal Revenue Code (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    That makes two for the FDIC: 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issues another precedential decision interpreting tax sharing agreements in bankruptcy, awards ownership of tax refund to FDIC
    2013-10-16

    The Bottom Line: 

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Eleventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Daniel M. Eggermann
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Seventh Circuit: failure to file proof of claim does not foreclose your rights
    2011-08-30

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Federal Reporter, Budget, Debt, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Secured creditor, In rem jurisdiction, US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Anita Wong
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Southern District of New York rules that non-impairment clauses do not apply in bankruptcy
    2007-10-04

    While many amendments to bond indentures can be made without consent from all bondholders, “non-impairment” clauses provide that the indenture may not be amended or restructured in any way that will affect or impair a bondholder’s right to receive principal and interest when due without unanimous consent.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Dissenting opinion, Default (finance), Stay of execution, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    It’s called "adequate" – not "automatic" – protection
    2013-09-12

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Legal burden of proof, Tax lien, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Fifth Circuit: recharacterization, it’s not just for insiders anymore
    2011-08-17

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Legal burden of proof, Maturity (finance), United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Matthew Ziegler
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Bankruptcy judge in Southern District of NY compels members of ad hoc committee to disclose pricing and other information related to their positions
    2007-03-19

    Over the last several weeks, Judge Allan L. Gropper of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York has issued two rulings in the Northwest Airlines case that threaten to alter significantly the consequences to distressed investors of serving on ad hoc committees in bankruptcy cases.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Confidentiality, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Interest, Discovery, Debt, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Stay here – Second Circuit in Residential Capital holds automatic stay can be applied to non-debtors where action has an immediate adverse economic consequence for estate
    2013-08-21

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Mortgage-backed security, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Second Circuit, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Benjamin C. Wolf
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Cruel intentions: SDNY bankruptcy court holds mutual intent not required to plead state law actual fraud
    2011-08-15

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Fraud, Hedge funds, Limited liability partnership, Involuntary dismissal, Common law, Prima facie, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for SDNY
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Trademark licensees do not need the protection of Section 365(n) to continue to use property post-rejection
    2012-10-23

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    David Allen
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 465
    • Page 466
    • Page 467
    • Page 468
    • Current page 469
    • Page 470
    • Page 471
    • Page 472
    • Page 473
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days