Unless you are a specialized lender who makes loans to debtors-in-possession, you do not make a loan with the expectation that your borrower is going to file bankruptcy. Although the number of bankruptcy filings in California and nationally is trending slightly lower, filings remain at higher than normal levels. Nearly every lender has received the notice of a bankruptcy filing that was unexpected and then faced decisions as to what to do next.

In re Lehman Brothers Inc., Bankr. Case No. 08-01420 (JMP) (SIPA), 2011 WL 4553015 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2011)  

CASE SNAPSHOT

Effective December 1, 2011, a number of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure were amended. Two of the amendments specifically address the information required on Proof of Claim forms.

The amendment to Rule 3001 (Proof of Claim) is expanded to require that additional supporting information be filed with proofs of claim in individual debtor cases. The amendment authorizes a court to impose sanctions against a creditor that fails to provide the required information.  

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to settle the dispute as to whether secured creditors can credit bid in connection with asset sales done pursuant to liquidating plans. The Third Circuit in the Philadelphia Newspapers case and the Fifth Circuit in the Pacific Lumber case held that secured creditors do not have a statutory right to credit bid their debt at a sale conducted under a plan of reorganization pursuant to which the debtor elects to provide the secured creditors with the “indubitable equivalent” of their secured claim.

In re SUD Properties, Inc., Case No. 11-03833-8-RDD (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2011)  

CASE SNAPSHOT

In the Matter of Richard Louis Alexander (7th Cir., 2011) U.S. App. LEXIS 17110, (August 16, 2011)

CASE SNAPSHOT

Whittle Development, Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. et al. (In re Whittle Development Inc.) 2011 WL 3268398 (Bankr. N.D. Tex., July 27, 2011)  

CASE SNAPSHOT

In re The Colonial BancGroup, Inc., 2011 WL 2792477 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. July 15, 2011)

CASE SNAPSHOT

Recent trade publications have prophesized a wave of shipping bankruptcies. We have already seen several in the United States in 2011, such as Omega and Marco Polo. Trailer Bridge and General Maritime fi led in November. There will undoubtedly be more, despite the potential debtors having little or no connection to the United States. In this respect, non-U.S. listed shipowning companies considering restructuring and reorganization may not factor in the potential for a U.S. main proceeding under Chapter 11 reorganization on the assumption that they do not qualify to be U.S. debtors.

In the course of the next few weeks, Omega Navigation Enterprises, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, “Omega”), an international shipping enterprise, will find out if motions by certain of their lenders to, among other things, dismiss Omega’s chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings have been granted by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas.¹ If not, then Omega may be permitted to continue its attempt to reorganize its business under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.