Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    In re Grube (January 19, 2012)
    2012-03-06

    The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois held that a debtor's explanation of estate planning as a rationale for asset transfers made prior to bankruptcy is sufficient to survive the Bankruptcy Trustee's motion for summary judgment. However, the Court noted that a deeper factual analysis would be required and expressed skepticism for the debtor's estate planning rationale.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Proskauer Rose LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Limited liability company, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Albert W Gortz , David Pratt , Mitchell M Gaswirth , Andrew M Katzenstein
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    Legislation proposed in State of Michigan to declare solvency covenants of non-recourse loans unenforceable
    2012-03-07

    A proposed bill entitled the Nonrecourse Mortgage Loan Act and recently introduced to the Senate for the State of Michigan would regulate the use and enforceability of certain loan covenants in non-recourse commercial transactions. Presumably, the bill, Senate Bill No. 992 introduced on Feb. 29, 2012 and referred to the Committee on Economic Development, is in reaction to a recent decision of the Michigan Court of Appeals finding a guarantor liable for a deficiency claim notwithstanding the non-recourse nature of the loan. See Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Cherryland Mall Ltd.

    Filed under:
    USA, Michigan, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Surety, Debtor, Mortgage loan, Wells Fargo
    Authors:
    John T. Gregg , Patrick E. Mears , Kenneth W. (Ken) Vermeulen
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Barnes & Thornburg LLP
    Borrower beware: violation of solvency covenant transforms non-recourse loan into full-recourse loan
    2012-03-08

    In a recent Michigan Court of Appeals case, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. vs. Cherryland Mall Limited Partnership et al., (2011 WL 6795393), the court found that the borrower’s violation of a solvency covenant triggered the conversion of the borrower’s and guarantor’s non-recourse obligations to full- recourse obligations. In light of the decision, when negotiating a non-recourse loan, parties would be well advised to pay close attention to the recourse covenants and to be very clear about which covenants, if breached, would trigger full recourse.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Holland & Knight LLP, Debtor, Wells Fargo
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Knight LLP
    Credit bidding and the Supreme Court: what happens next?
    2012-03-08

    On December 12, 2011, the Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in a case raising the question of whether a debtor's chapter 11 plan is confirmable when it proposes an auction sale of a secured creditor's assets free and clear of liens without permitting that creditor to "credit bid" its claims but instead provides the creditor with the "indubitable equivalent" of its secured claim. RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank, No. 11-166 (cert. granted Dec. 12, 2011).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Credit (finance), Debtor, Secured creditor, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Beth Heifetz , Kevyn D. Orr , Dan T. Moss
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Decisions in Enron and Madoff cases confirm safe harbor protections
    2012-02-29

    Active participants in the derivatives market rely on the Bankruptcy Code safe harbor set forth in section 546(e) in pricing their securities. That provision restricts a debtor’s power to recover payments made in connection with certain securities transactions that might otherwise be avoidable under the Bankruptcy Code. Two high profile cases decided in 2011 addressed challenges to the application of section 546(e). The more widely reported decision (at least outside the bankruptcy arena) was in connection with the Madoff insolvency case. See Picard v.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Security (finance), Derivatives market, Enron
    Authors:
    Robert J. Gayda
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Chadbourne & Parke LLP
    Third Circuit- turning loans to not-for-profits into gifts
    2012-03-02

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    David Allen
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Defanging Stern v. Marshall
    2012-03-05

    Defanging Stern v. Marshall1: The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Modifies the Reference of Bankruptcy Matters to Address Issues Resulting from the Supreme Court’s Ruling

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Debtor, US Constitution, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Reorganization and consolidated rulings issued
    2012-02-27

    The usual Friday release of a large number of letter rulings by the IRS included several rulings of interest on reorganizations and consolidated return issues.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Alston & Bird LLP, Shareholder, Debtor, Security (finance), Liquidation, Holding company, C corporation, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Authors:
    Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings , Jr.
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Prepayment premiums: lenders must avoid this mistake
    2012-02-27

    Prepayment provisions are intended, in part, to protect lenders in a depressed market from losses resulting from the costs of replacing their loans sooner than expected and having to relend at rates lower than those originally charged.  A New York federal district court recently upheld a bankruptcy judge's ruling denying a lender's claim for a $7.5 million prepayment premium against a borrower-debtor.1 The lender must have been both surprised and disappointed to learn from the courts' decisions that this result could have been avoided had the lender's loan documents included

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herrick Feinstein LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Consideration, Debt, Foreclosure, Default (finance)
    Authors:
    Paul Rubin , Hanh Huynh
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Herrick Feinstein LLP
    Important 2011 rulings on foreign proceedings
    2012-02-29

    Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code was enacted in 2005 to create a procedure to recognize an insolvency or debt adjustment proceeding in another country and to, in essence, domesticate that proceeding in the United States. Once a foreign proceeding is “recognized,” a step which cannot be achieved without a foreign representative satisfying various requirements, the foreign representative may obtain certain protections from a United Stated bankruptcy court, including the imposition of the automatic stay to protect the foreign debtor’s property in the United States.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Debtor, Liquidation, Bear Stearns, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Francisco Vazquez , Eric Daucher
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Chadbourne & Parke LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 281
    • Page 282
    • Page 283
    • Page 284
    • Current page 285
    • Page 286
    • Page 287
    • Page 288
    • Page 289
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days