1.Why use an electronic signature?
2.What is e-signing?
3.Is e-signing valid?
4.What types of document can be signed electronically?
5. Are there any restrictions/protocols relating to electronic signatures?
6. What is the position with overseas entities?
7. E-signing with a secure platform
8. E-signing without a secure platform
Why use an electronic signature?
An edited version of this article first appeared in Smart Company. By Special Counsel Katherine Payne and partners Mark Petrucco and
The confirmed number of persons in Russia infected with SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19 (Corona) exceeds 32,000. Many people and enterprises are affected by non-working days, lock down measures and the resulting direct and indirect impact on work, business and finances. This summary highlights some recent legal issues in connection with the Corona crisis in Russia.
Please find more information in the attached report>>
Year in Review – Latin America in 2016
Argentina
Sovereign debt restructuring: On April 22, 2016, after Congress approved a settlement proposal, Argentina issued US$16.5bn of new debt securities in the international capital markets, and applied US$9.3bn of these proceeds to satisfy settlement payments on agreements with holders.
For the benefit of our clients and friends investing in European distressed opportunities, our European Network is sharing some current developments
Recent Developments
Small business is undoubtedly the lifeblood of economies, more so where those economies are emerging and developing. The promotion and nurturing of entrepreneurship is a key factor in economic success, not just for those entrepreneurs, but for the wider society, which, as stakeholders, benefits from the generation and distribution of wealth through economic and social policy. One unresolved question, however, is how to treat MSMEs (micro-, small- and medium-enterprises) in insolvency.
Both the corporate voluntary arrangement and judicial management, together with the Companies (Corporate Rescue Mechanism) Rules 2018 (“Rules”), came into force earlier this year on 1 March 2018 with the gazetting of notice P.U. (B) 106/2018.
We have previously discussed the insolvency law policy and procedure, touching briefly on judicial management and corporate voluntary arrangement. We will now look at the rules applicable for the application for these two rescue mechanisms.
Corporate Voluntary Arrangement
GUIDE TO RESTRUCTURING, TURNAROUND AND INSOLVENCY IN ASIA PACIFIC OCTOBER 2018
被称为“中国民办教育破产第一案”的遵义中山中学破产案，曾经一度在民办教育领域闹的沸沸扬扬，立下豪言壮志的校长刘永松经营失败锒铛入狱，引发嘘声一片。关联到破产理论和实务，对民办学校破产的程序适用、各种类型债权清偿顺位及法律依据等众多问题，莫衷一是，难有定论。四川省法院系统层报最高人民法院，最高人民法院专门就该案处理召开审判委员会会议，讨论中山中学破产案的程序适用及债权清偿等重大疑难问题。最高人民法院于2010年12月16日发布了《关于因资不抵债无法继续办学被终止的民办学校如何组织清算问题的批复》，对相关问题进行了答复。该案以遵义一中1.7亿元接盘破产财产，破产清算偿债，才得以尘埃落定。[1]虽然该案顺利办结，但隐藏在案件背后对民办教育机构的市场退出路径、《民办教育促进法》和《企业破产法》的冲突和适用、不同债权类型的清偿顺位等疑云仍挥散不去。
This is the twenty-ninth in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas.