Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Access to bankruptcy proceedings in Mexico
    2019-02-04

    According to the Federal Constitution (Article 17) and the international trades subscribed by the Mexican government, one of the most sacred human rights that exist nowadays is the right of “access to justice”, which can be translated into several specific rights, including that any jurisdictional authority (id est Court or Tribunal) must provide to all the particulars with an efficient resort to solve their claims effectively.

    Filed under:
    Mexico, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, SOLCARGO, Commercial law, UNCITRAL, United Nations
    Authors:
    Fernando Pérez-Correa , Francisco Abimael Hernández , Zulima González
    Location:
    Mexico
    Firm:
    SOLCARGO
    La gestión durante el cumplimiento del convenio y sus efectos sobre la calificación fortuita o culpable del concurso (STS, Sala Primera, de 13 de Abril del 2016)
    2016-05-30

    Análisis GA&P | Mayo 2016 1 N. de la C.: En las citas literales se ha rectificado en lo posible —sin afectar al sentido— la grafía de ciertos elementos (acentos, mayúsculas, símbolos, abreviaturas, cursivas...) para adecuarlos a las normas tipográficas utilizadas en el resto del texto. 1.

    Filed under:
    Spain, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Gomez-Acebo & Pombo Abogados, Commercial law
    Location:
    Spain
    Firm:
    Gomez-Acebo & Pombo Abogados
    Thai Law Year in Review 2016 and Year to Come 2017
    2017-01-05

    Year in Review – Thai Law in 2016

    Filed under:
    Thailand, Banking, Capital Markets, Company & Commercial, Competition & Antitrust, Employment & Labor, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Projects & Procurement, Linklaters LLP, Share (finance), Corporate governance, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debt, Insider trading, Life insurance, Commercial law, Market manipulation
    Location:
    Thailand
    Firm:
    Linklaters LLP
    Dubai World restructuring - the legislation and how it may work
    2009-12-31

    On Monday 14 December 2009 the Dubai Financial Support Fund received a further US$10bn from the Abu Dhabi Government to be used to satisfy a series of upcoming obligations of Dubai World and its subsidiaries (“DWG”). The monies were used in part to pay off the Nakheel sukuk which matured on the same day. The markets in the region (and elsewhere) reacted positively with significant gains and Dubai's CDS spreads narrowed. That same afternoon the Dubai Government announced a new law (Decree No. 57). Sheikh Ahmad Bin Saeed Al Maktoum, Chairman of the Dubai Supreme Fiscal Committee, said:

    Filed under:
    United Arab Emirates, Insolvency & Restructuring, Norton Rose Fulbright, Debtor, Injunction, Common law, Commercial law, Dubai International Financial Centre, DIFC Courts
    Authors:
    Patrick Bourke
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    UK Supreme Court upholds “flip” clauses
    2011-08-09

    Structured finance transaction documents have typically included subordination provisions in their post-default waterfalls, effectively changing a swap counterparty’s right to get paid from above that of the noteholders to below that of the noteholders.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Swap (finance), Good faith, Common law, Commercial law, Default (finance), Lehman Brothers, UK Supreme Court, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Nikiforos Mathews , Edward G. Eisert , William S. Haft , Thomas C. Mitchell , Al B. Sawyers
    Location:
    United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
    Here Lions Roam: CISG As The Measure of A Claim's Value And Validity And A Debtor's Dischargeability
    2018-10-15

    HERE LIONS ROAM: CISG AS THE MEASURE OF A CLAIM'S

    VALUE AND VALIDITY AND A DEBTOR'S

    DISCHARGEABILITY

    Amir Shachmurove*

    INTRODUCTION ............................................ ..... 463

    I. A COMEDY OF ERRORS .............. 468

    II. RELEVANT BANKRUPTCY LAW: THE CODE AND THE RULES ............ 470

    A. Code and Rules .......................... ......... 470

    B. Determination of a Claim 's Validity and Value .............. 471

    C. Temporary Valuation Pursuant to Rule 3018(a) .... ........ 475

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Troutman Pepper, Debtor, Commercial law, Bill of lading, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Upcoming Supreme Court Docket Includes Cases to Watch for Commercial Lawyers
    2016-08-31

    The first Monday of each October marks the beginning of a fresh term for the Supreme Court of the United States. As the 2016 term approaches, the court’s docket has already begun to fill with cases that will impact commercial practitioners. While the court will continue to accept additional cases throughout the upcoming term, it has already agreed to hear at least five cases that may have significant implications for commercial lawyers throughout the country.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Company & Commercial, Competition & Antitrust, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Real Estate, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Commercial law, Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 1976 (USA), Sherman Antitrust Act 1890 (USA), Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Mark J. Crandley
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Barnes & Thornburg LLP
    Bankruptcy Settlements may not have to Comply with the Absolute Priority Rule? Not so fast…
    2016-06-29

    In an earlier blog piece we reported on the Third Circuit’s 2015 decision in In re Jevic Holding Corp. where the Court approved a settlement, implemented through a structured dismissal, which allowed junior creditors to receive a distribution prior to senior creditors being paid in full.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Commercial law, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 (USA), Trustee, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Eric R. Blythe
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Florida Supreme Court rules debtor may not use single-member LLC to shield assets from judgment creditor
    2010-06-28

    In a much anticipated decision, the Florida Supreme Court closed a statutory loophole that permitted debtors to use a wholly owned limited liability company (LLC) to put their assets beyond the reach of their judgment creditors. In Olmstead v. FTC, Case No. SC08-1009 (Fla. June 24, 2010), the Florida Supreme Court ruled that a court may order a judgment debtor to surrender all right, title, and interest in the debtor's single-member Florida limited liability company to satisfy an outstanding judgment.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Foley & Lardner LLP, Debtor, Interest, Limited liability company, Debt, Commercial law, Exclusive jurisdiction, Federal Trade Commission (USA), Supreme Court of the United States, Florida Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Stephen A. (Steve) Crane , Gardner F. Davis , Mary F. Kendrick , William J. McKenna
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Business law quarterly - winter 2013
    2014-01-10

    Supreme Court Rules on Importing And Selling Foreign Made Goods

    Filed under:
    USA, Copyrights, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Trademarks, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Commercial law, Exclusive right, Google, Copyright Act 1976 (USA), Supreme Court of the United States, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    Andrew H. Connor , Maria A. Diakoumakis , Jeffrey A. Pine
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dykema Gossett PLLC

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Current page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days