Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    The CCAA scene: recent and notable
    2009-06-29

    Allarco Entertainment

    On June 16, 2009, Allarco Entertainment Inc. and Allarco Entertainment 2008 Inc. filed under the CCAA in Alberta.

    Allarco Entertainment owns Super Channel, an Edmonton-based TV network. According to Court documents, Super Channel has approximately 222,000 subscribers. Super Channel broadcasts feature films, original series, specials and mini-series in high definition.

    Eddie Bauer

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Retail, Credit (finance), Debtor, Limited liability company, Subsidiary, Secured loan, NASDAQ, Bank of America, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Alex Tarantino
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Set-off revisited
    2009-06-29

    Set-off is a powerful and often under-appreciated insolvency remedy in Canada. A recent decision of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench highlighted the importance of the doctrine and examined the requirements for a claim of equitable set-off in the context of a corporate group.

    The right to assert valid set-off claims is expressly preserved in Canadian insolvency legislation. The remedy applies such that creditors may set-off (or net-out) amounts owing to them by an insolvent party, against amounts otherwise payable by them to the insolvent party.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Legal personality, Liquidation
    Authors:
    David Ward
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Holiday cheer - Alberta court grants rare extension to unpaid supplier
    2009-06-29

    Unpaid suppliers are generally unsecured in liquidation proceedings. A supplier can elevate its unsecured claim by taking security from the debtor or modifying its supply contract by inserting an effective title retention clause. The supplier may also rely on the BIA unpaid supplier provision to assert a super-priority for the return of its goods.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Goldman Sachs
    Authors:
    Harvey Garman
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Availability of cross-border guarantees for DIP financing in CCAA cases
    2009-06-29

    In a series of cases in 2009 culminating in the decision of the Honourable Mr. Justice Morawetz in Re Indalex Limited (“Indalex”), the CCAA Courts have considered the appropriateness of approving the granting of a guarantee in connection with a cross-border DIP facility. This issue has been at the forefront – with varying results – in a number of recent CCAA cases in which DIP financing was dependent on the CCAA debtor providing a secured guarantee of the obligations of the parent or affiliate company’s DIP financing in its own Chapter 11 case.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Stakeholder (corporate), Precondition, Prejudice, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Joseph Bellissimo
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Abitibi CBCA plan of arrangement order has implications for eligible financial contracts
    2009-06-29

    Earlier this year Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. (Abitibi) and various related entities proposed to enter into an arrangement with certain classes of its creditors relying on the plan of arrangement provisions in the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA). It is unusual to propose a corporate plan with respect to a company's debt. The CBCA plan of arrangement provision is not fundamentally an insolvency law. The procedure is most often used to restructure securityholder relationships within solvent companies and that is the primary intention.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Interim order, Swap (finance), Default (finance), Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Canada Business Corporations Act 1985, Quebec Superior Court
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Stikeman Elliott LLP
    The monitor’s power to revise claims after a claims bar date
    2009-06-30

    In Re ScoZinc Ltd., 2009 NSSC 136 the monitor appointed under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) brought a motion for directions on whether it had the authority to allow the revision of a claim after the claim’s bar date, but before the date set for the monitor to complete its assessment of claims.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Shareholder, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Stakeholder (corporate), Prejudice, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Authors:
    David W. Mann , David LeGeyt
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Unregistered prior general security agreement v. subsequent 427 Bank Act security
    2009-05-14

    Innovation Credit Union v. Bank of Montreal [2009] S.J. No. 147; 2009 SKCA 35, on appeal from 2007 SKQB 471

    October 1991:     Saskatchewan farmer James Buist (“Debtor”) granted a general security agreement to Innovation Credit Union (“CU”). The general security agreement was not perfected under the Saskatchewan Personal Property Security Act (“PPSA”) by registration.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Interest, Debt, Credit union, Default (finance), Bank Act 1991 (Canada), Personal Property Security Act 1990 (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Boom, bust and dip
    2009-05-19

    The extraordinary turmoil in the financial markets in recent times has caused many major economies, including the Canadian economy, to enter into a recessionary period. With the financial sector still trying to cope with the shocks of 2007 and 2008, prospects for a full Canadian economic recovery in the near future appear uncertain. Recent decisions by well-established Canadian companies such as Nortel Networks and Masonite International Corporation (a Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Supply chain, Liquidation, Chrysler, Title 11 of the US Code, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Justin Parappally
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Stikeman Elliott LLP
    Rationalizing CCAA appeals
    2009-05-21

    A recent decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal has rationalized the approach to be taken by Courts in considering appeals in CCAA cases.

    Filed under:
    Canada, British Columbia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Debtor, Discovery, Substantial similarity, Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Authors:
    Bruce Leonard
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    "Hardship" fund for CCAA creditors
    2009-05-21

    The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench recently permitted a debtor to establish a "hardship" fund to pay obligations incurred prior to the debtor's CCAA filing to local suppliers operating in the debtor’s community.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Renewable energy, Accounts receivable, Supply chain, Wind power, Wind farm, Secured creditor
    Authors:
    Alex Tarantino
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 140
    • Page 141
    • Page 142
    • Page 143
    • Current page 144
    • Page 145
    • Page 146
    • Page 147
    • Page 148
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days