Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    A warning to directors and officers — failure to give proper WARN Act notice may breach your fiduciary duty
    2015-10-09

    At first glance, Stanziale v. MILK072011, looks like someone suing over a bad expiration date and conjures up images of Ron Burgundy proclaiming “milk was a bad choice.” But in actuality Stanziale is much more interesting: it answers whether one can breach their fiduciary duty by exposing an employer to a claim under the aptly-named WARN Act, which requires employers to tip off their workers to a possible job loss.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act 1988 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Arbitration limitation: Ninth Circuit holds that a bankruptcy court may refuse to enforce an arbitration clause
    2012-05-21

    Clients often raise questions concerning the enforceability of arbitration clauses in bankruptcy proceedings. While this topic has been hotly debated for many years, a recent Ninth Circuit opinion, In re Thorpe Insulation Co., 671 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 2012), reminds us that arbitration clauses are not sacrosanct and can be struck down by the court.

    Filed under:
    USA, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Arbitration clause, Federal Arbitration Act 1926 (USA), US Congress, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Primer for construction bankruptcies
    2011-12-07

    In general, a company has two bankruptcy alternatives: liquidation under Chapter 7 and reorganization under Chapter 11.

    Under Chapter 7, upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, a trustee is appointed to gather and sell all of the debtor’s assets as quickly as possible. Once the trustee liquidates all of the assets, it must pay creditors in accordance with the priority scheme mandated by the Bankruptcy Code:

    Filed under:
    USA, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mintz, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Breach of contract
    Authors:
    Samuel M. Tony Starr
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Surviving the aircraft financial pandemic
    2009-07-28

    There are signs of hope in the aviation marketplace, with the slow return of financing and the apparent bottoming-out of aircraft values. Buying opportunities abound-but so do risks; and no situation is more frustrating than finding yourself "infected" by someone else's bankruptcy. Even if the market has reached its nadir, there are many companies that are simply not going to survive much longer in the market as it has been redefined.

    Filed under:
    USA, Aviation, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Letter of credit, Collateral (finance), Breach of contract, Interest, Fair market value, Unsecured creditor, US Securities and Exchange Commission
    Authors:
    Alexander M. Laughlin
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Intellectual property in bankruptcy
    2008-06-20

    Intellectual property rights, such as copyrights, trademarks, and patents, are critical to the operation of many businesses. Often the rights to use intellectual property are dependent upon licenses granting a contractual right to the use of the intellectual property. The bankruptcy of an intellectual property licensor can substantially impact the business of the licensee and the continued right to the use of the licensed intellectual property. Similarly, a bankruptcy filing by a licensee may jeopardize important revenue streams, which a licensor of the intellectual property relies upon.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, Wiley Rein LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Breach of contract, Business judgement rule, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Court applies exclusion for claims involving receivership of a healthcare benefit plan
    2008-06-16

    The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, applying Florida law, has held that exclusions for claims involving the receivership of a healthcare benefit plan and claims involving Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements (MEWA) barred coverage for claims brought by a receiver of a healthcare benefit plan alleging that brokers sold coverage under a benefit plan that was a MEWA. White v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 2008 WL 2073905 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2008).

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Breach of contract, Health insurance, Marketing, US District Court for Middle District of Florida
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Fourth Circuit sets limits of bankruptcy court’s post-confirmation jurisdiction
    2007-06-07

    The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently held that a bankruptcy court did not have jurisdiction to hear a chapter 11 debtor's breach of contract and tortious interference claims, which the debtor filed after its chapter 11 plan had been confirmed and substantially consummated. Valley Historic Limited Partnership v. Bank of New York, No. 06-1571,___ F.3d ___, WL 1439734 (4th Cir. May 17, 2007). This decision delineates the limits of bankruptcy court's jurisdiction over claims filed by the debtor after plan confirmation.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Breach of contract, Interest, Federal Reporter, Tortious interference, Liquidation, Subject-matter jurisdiction, Bank of New York Mellon, United States bankruptcy court, Fourth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Bankruptcy trustees not entitled to injunctive relief that would give them priority to D&O policy proceeds
    2007-05-15

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts has denied injunctive relief requested by two bankruptcy trustees seeking to stay the prosecution and settlement of shareholder actions proceeding against various former officers and directors of a bankrupt corporation. In re Enivid, 2007 WL 806627 (Bankr. D. Mass. Mar. 16, 2007).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Injunction, Security (finance), Breach of contract, Class action, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Preliminary injunction, Liquidation, US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Massachusetts, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Unwinding the deal when bankruptcy looms
    2007-02-22

    Coping with the Insolvent Business Partner

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Punitive damages, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Injunction, Breach of contract, Joint venture, Liquidation, Due diligence, Default (finance), Leverage (finance), Distressed securities, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Suit for misuse of investment funds does not allege act in performance of “mortgage broker services” within definition of “insured services”
    2013-10-08

    The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas has held that underlying claims that the insureds misused investment funds intended for the purchase of nonperforming mortgages did not allege negligent acts, errors, or omissions in performing “mortgage broker services” within the policy’s definition of “Insured Services.”  Axis Surplus Ins. Co. v. Halo Asset Mgmt., LLC, 2013 WL 5416268 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2013).

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Breach of contract, Mortgage loan, Negligence
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • Page 32
    • Current page 33
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • Page 36
    • Page 37
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days