The Ninth Circuit, in Blixseth v. Credit Suisse, 961 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 2020), issued a significant decision on the issue of whether nonconsensual third-party releases are ever permitted in Chapter 11 plans. Distinguishing its prior decisions on the topic, the Ninth Circuit permitted a nonconsensual third-party release that was limited to the exculpation of participants in the reorganization from claims based on actions taken during the case.
Statutory Background
In 2018, Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Commerce and Investment (MOCI) published a new Bankruptcy Law aiming to provide bankrupt or insolvent debtors the opportunity to reorganize or rescue their business and streamlining the liquidation process to ensure fairer distribution to creditors upon liquidation. The new Bankruptcy Law is also intended to improve the investment environment and attract more investments to Saudi Arabia and reinforce confidence in the credit market and financial transactions. These goals are in line with the country's goals for Saudi Vision 2030.
Background
The Bankruptcy Law (Federal Decree Law 9. of 2016 concerning bankruptcy) is the first comprehensive UAE law to deal with and delineate insolvency procedures. It offers a number of roadmaps which a business in financial hardship can take advantage of with a view to continuing to trade.
During the current times, it is useful to assess these options.
Government mediation and conciliation
Let’s say you’re a hemp/CBD business (that also services the cannabis industry in a limited capacity) and COVID-19 has hit you. Hard. You’ve stretched your resources as far as you can, but you’re still on the ropes financially.
The Federal Magistrates Court recently found that an undischarged bankrupt was unable to seek compensation or a financial penalty against a former employer for unlawful dismissal, but was able to seek reinstatement instead.
On 21 December 2011, the New South Wales Court of Appeal (Court) delivered its decision in Moss v Eaglestone (2011) 257 FLR 96. This decision clarifies the circumstances in which legal causes of action will be considered property divisible amongst a bankrupt’s creditors.
Background
In 2007, Moss supplied information regarding Schapelle Corby to Nationwide News Pty Ltd (News). News published this information in a newspaper article, which also referred to Moss’s criminal background.
Introduction
Another failed property developer has just been made bankrupt in Australia, this time with a difference – he was already bankrupt in New Zealand. Bank of Western Australia (Bank) v David Stewart Henderson (No. 3) [2011] FMCA 840 is another Australian cross-border insolvency case in which we have successfully tested the boundaries of the Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 (Cth) (the CBIA), this time with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
With REDgroup administrators, Ferrier Hodgson, desperately searching for a buyer for REDgroup's Australian book business, the consequences for franchisees remains uncertain. Whilst the nine remaining Borders bookstores are set to close, no decision has yet been made on the future of Angus & Robertson (A&R).
The recent English decision in the Australian liquidation, New Cap Reinsurance Corpn Ltd (in liquidation) and another v Grant and others (available here), has further opened up the possibility for New Zealand insolvency proceedings to be recognised and enforced in the United Kingdom.
On 14 September 2010, the Senate Economics References Committee (Committee) released a report recommending reforms to Australia’s current insolvency regime (Report) in the following key areas:
- the regulation of the insolvency regime
- the registration of insolvency practitioners, and
- the remuneration of insolvency practitioners.
Implications
If the recommendations contained in the Report are enacted in legislation, stakeholders may be affected in the following ways: