Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    District court withdraws reference to the bankruptcy court of non-core coverage actions
    2011-07-14

    The United States District Court for the Central District of California has granted motions by eight directors and officers liability insurers to withdraw the reference to the bankruptcy court of two coverage actions involving coverage for claims against former directors and officers of a bank holding company.  In re IndyMac Bancorp, Inc., Nos. CV11-02600; CV11-02605; CV11-02950; CV11-02988 (C.D. Cal. May 17, 2011).  Wiley Rein LLP represents an excess insurer and the primary Side A insurer in the litigation.

    Filed under:
    USA, California, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Board of directors, Limited liability partnership, Standard of review, Holding company, Bank holding company, Article I US Constitution, US District Court for Central District of California, United States bankruptcy court, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Protecting manufacturers and distributors in bankruptcy
    2010-03-26

    It is a harrowing scenario for any seller of goods: a trading-partner files for bankruptcy and leaves the seller with thousands, even millions of dollars in unpaid invoices. In many instances, some of these goods were delivered only days before the bankruptcy filing. While a creditor may be able to assert reclamation rights, those rights are often difficult to enforce in bankruptcy and may be subordinate to the interests of an all assets lender.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Consumer protection, US Code, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Chapter 11 permits modification and extension of loans without consent of the lender
    2009-01-09

    As a result of the meltdown of the financial markets, lenders are severely constricting new credit facilities and refusing to renew expiring facilities. The Bankruptcy Code's chapter 11 provides a powerful mechanism for an otherwise viable business to restructure and extend its outstanding debt and in many cases, reduce interest rates on loan facilities.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Discrimination, Interest, Debt, Secured creditor, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Business debt restructuring still available through Chapter 11
    2008-03-21

    Recent news reports have focused on the problems of the financial markets on the one hand and consumer mortgage problems on the other. While Congress may yet grant authority to bankruptcy judges to modify home loans, modification of business loan facilities of all sizes remains available as a powerful and fundamental tool to be used in a business financial restructuring.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Discrimination, Interest, Mortgage loan, Good faith, Secured creditor, Debt restructuring, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Proceeds of D&O policy are not property of the estate despite entity coverage
    2007-07-20

    In two related actions, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware ruled that the proceeds of a D&O policy are not property of the debtor's estate and refused to grant an injunction requested by a trustee to prevent the directors and officers from consummating a settlement that would exhaust the policy limits.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Injunction, Board of directors, Standing (law), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, US District Court for Western District of Pennsylvania, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Settlement agreement extends to later claims covered by scope of release
    2012-11-12

    The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, applying Texas law, has held that a settlement agreement resolving coverage litigation released the insurer’s obligation for defense costs for certain claims tendered for coverage under a subsequent policy.  Nat’l Heritage Found., Inc. v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co., 2012 WL 5331570 (E.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2012).

    Filed under:
    USA, Virginia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Professional liability policy proceeds not property of bankruptcy estates
    2011-06-23

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada has held that proceeds from a professional liability policy were not property of the insured-debtors' bankruptcy estate because the proceeds were payable only for the benefit of third party claimants and could not be accessed by the debtors directly.  In re Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada, Nos. BK-S-09-22780-MKN, S-09-22776-MKN, S-09-22784-MKN, 2011 WL 2184387 (Bankr. D. Nev. May 23, 2011).

    Filed under:
    USA, Nevada, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Professional Negligence, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Proofs of claim and objections - tricks of the trade revisited
    2009-11-20

    Filing a successful proof of claim is the key to unlocking a creditor's right to recover against a debtor in bankruptcy. Only in limited circumstances may a creditor recover against the debtor's estate without properly filing a proof of claim. This article addresses the various stages of filing, attacking and defending a proof of claim.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Wage, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Legal burden of proof, Prima facie, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Bankruptcy court holds inadequate consideration exclusion bars coverage
    2008-12-16

    A federal bankruptcy court, applying New York law, has dismissed an adversary proceeding brought by a bankrupt home mortgage company against its directors and officers liability insurers, holding that coverage for a pre-petition lawsuit against the mortgage company was barred by application of an “inadequate consideration” exclusion. Delta Fin. Corp. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., Case No. 07-11880 (CSS) (Jointly Administered) (Bankr. D. Del. Dec. 15, 2008). The court also held that the coverage dispute was a non-core proceeding.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Unsecured debt, Waiver, Consideration, Mortgage loan, Fair market value, Holding company, Cashflow, Delaware Supreme Court, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Untimely objection waives Fifth Amendment objection in coverage dispute
    2008-03-11

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania has ruled that a defendant in a declaratory judgment coverage action waived all of his discovery objections, including objections based upon the Fifth Amendment, for failing timely to assert them. Federal Ins. Co. v. Le-Nature's, Inc., 380 B.R. 747 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2008). Wiley Rein LLP represented the insurer.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Waiver, Federal Reporter, Discovery, Indictment, Prejudice, Fifth Amendment, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 602
    • Page 603
    • Page 604
    • Page 605
    • Current page 606
    • Page 607
    • Page 608
    • Page 609
    • Page 610
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days