Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    427 Bank Act security v. Livery Stable Keepers Act
    2009-10-20

    TD Bank v. Dunn-Rite Cattle Corp. [2009] A.W.L.D. 2075; 2009 ABQB 227 (Alta. Q.B.), on hearing of issue from (2006) 26 C.B.R. (5th) 1 (Alta. C.A.)

    The master granted TD priority to the subject cattle ahead of the Dunns’ lien pursuant to the since repealed Livery Stable Keepers Act. The Dunns appealed to the Alberta Court of Appeal, which allowed the appeal and because of sparse evidence, directed the matter of priority be heard by the Court of Queen’s Bench.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Debtor, Waiver, Bank Act 1991 (Canada), Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Is it time to stop all this intermingling?
    2009-09-17

    The Alberta Court of Appeal recently ruled on a case1 dealing with the priority of claims to the bank accounts of a petroleum operator which had gone into receivership, where the operatorship was governed by the 1990 CAPL Operating Procedure. The operator had failed to pay to the non-operators revenues of approximately $300,000, having only $58,000 left in the commingled account. The Operating Procedure imposes a trust on the production revenues but also expressly allows intermingling of these funds with the operator's general funds.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Gowling WLG, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Legal burden of proof, Dissenting opinion, Secured creditor, Constructive trust, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Authors:
    Jeff W. Bright
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    Court preserves right to sue receiver in respect of court-approved transaction
    2009-07-30

    1117387 Ontario Inc., by court order in October 2003, was placed under receivership for defaulting on payment of a mortgage. In October 2008, the Court was asked to approve the receiver’s third report and the proposed sale of the mortgaged lands. A complicating factor was that the mortgaged lands were subject to environmental contamination as a result of a neighbouring oil and gas facility.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Pollution, Surety, Debtor, Debt, Mortgage loan, Fossil fuel, Frivolous litigation, Vexatious litigation, Default (finance)
    Authors:
    David W. Mann , David LeGeyt
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Solvency problems? Make sure to react swiftly
    2009-08-31

    In these trying times for our economy and our financial system, every business leader should pay attention to the company’s needs for working capital for the year and prepare for any potential problem related to its lack of liquidities.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Heenan Blaikie LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Refinancing, Cashflow, Credit rating, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Heenan Blaikie LLP
    Competition between prior unperfected general security agreement and later 427 Bank Act security, to after acquired assets
    2009-05-14

    Radius Credit Union Limited v. Royal Bank of Canada [2009] S.J. No. 148, 2009 SKCA 36, on appeal from
    2007 SKQB 472

    1992: Farmer Wayne Hingtgen (“Debtor”) granted a general security agreement to Radius
    Credit Union Limited (“CU”) granting a security interest on all his present and after
    acquired assets.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Conflict of laws, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Credit union, Royal Bank of Canada, Bank Act 1991 (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Unregistered prior general security agreement v. subsequent 427 Bank Act security
    2009-05-14

    Innovation Credit Union v. Bank of Montreal [2009] S.J. No. 147; 2009 SKCA 35, on appeal from 2007 SKQB 471

    October 1991:     Saskatchewan farmer James Buist (“Debtor”) granted a general security agreement to Innovation Credit Union (“CU”). The general security agreement was not perfected under the Saskatchewan Personal Property Security Act (“PPSA”) by registration.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Interest, Debt, Credit union, Default (finance), Bank Act 1991 (Canada), Personal Property Security Act 1990 (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Boom, bust and dip
    2009-05-19

    The extraordinary turmoil in the financial markets in recent times has caused many major economies, including the Canadian economy, to enter into a recessionary period. With the financial sector still trying to cope with the shocks of 2007 and 2008, prospects for a full Canadian economic recovery in the near future appear uncertain. Recent decisions by well-established Canadian companies such as Nortel Networks and Masonite International Corporation (a Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Supply chain, Liquidation, Chrysler, Title 11 of the US Code, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Justin Parappally
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Stikeman Elliott LLP
    Debtor in possession charge in priority to Canada Revenue Agency’s deemed trust
    2009-04-29

    TrustIn Canada (Deputy Attorney General) v. Temple City Housing Inc., the Alberta Court of Appeal had to consider an application for leave to appeal a provision in a Companies Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (“CCAA”) order granting a DIP lender a charge in priority over the claims of CRA. The claims of CRA consisted of deemed trust claims arising under sections 224(1.2), 227(4) and 227(4.1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Tax deduction, Involuntary dismissal, Debtor in possession, Civil Rights Act 1964 (USA), Constitutional amendment, Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Authors:
    David LeGeyt , David W. Mann
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Superintendent’s Levy deducted from repayment of bank’s mortgage
    2009-01-30

    In Seeley (Trustee of) v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (2008), the Bankruptcy Court determined that the Superintendent’s Levy was payable on the amount paid to a secured creditor by a Trustee in bankruptcy.The bankrupt made an assignment into bankruptcy. He owned a cabin which was mortgaged to the Bank.

    The Trustee sent the Bank three notices requiring it to file proof of its security. The Bank did not respond.The cabin was sold and subsequently the Bank filed a Proof of Claim in the bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Dividends, Interest, Debt, Mortgage loan, Secured creditor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Perfection of a security interest in a cash collateral account
    2008-10-14

    Banks have a recognized right to set off amounts owing by the bank to its customer (i.e. a credit balance in the customer’s bank account) against the customer’s debt to the bank. However, banks frequently wish to have the additional comfort of obtaining a security interest in the customer’s credit balance in a designated bank account. Banks frequently refer to this security as a pledge of cash collateral.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Debt, Personal property, Intangible asset, Personal Property Security Act 1990 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 159
    • Page 160
    • Page 161
    • Page 162
    • Current page 163
    • Page 164
    • Page 165
    • Page 166
    • Page 167
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days