Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Liquidators' remuneration and expenses - value-based remuneration and closer scrutiny of expenses
    2014-10-23

    On 25 July 2014 and 17 September 2014 respectively, Justice Brereton of the Supreme Court of NSW delivered two related judgments in Re AAA Financial Intelligence Ltd (in liquidation) andRe AAA Financial Intelligence Ltd (in liquidation) (No 2). The decisions deal with the evergreen topic of Liquidator remuneration and expenses.

    Importantly, in fixing the Liquidators' remuneration, Justice Brereton adopted a "value" focussed approach, and discussed the relevance of considering matters beyond simply time spent multiplied by fixed hourly rates. 

    Filed under:
    Australia, United Kingdom, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, New South Wales Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Maria O'Brien , Peter Lucarelli , David Walter , John Anderson
    Location:
    Australia, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Extensions of time for liquidator's recovery actions - "shelf orders" to be scrutinised by the High Court
    2014-10-20

    Since BP Australia Pty Ltd v Brown, there has been a practice of Courts across Australia granting "shelf orders", whereby time for voidable transaction recovery actions by a Liquidator under section 588FF is extended "at large".  The Court's power to grant these "shelf orders", however, is to be scrutinised by the High Court in December 2014, in the course of the Octaviar group liquidation.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie
    Authors:
    David Walter , Maria O'Brien , Peter Lucarelli , Jahan Navidi
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Personal Property Securities Act: are credit applications "transitional security agreements"?
    2014-03-17

    In the recent Victorian Supreme Court decision of Central Cleaning Supplies (Aust) Pty Ltd v Elkerton and Young (in their capacity as joint and several liquidators of Swan Services Pty Ltd (in liquidation))[1], the Supreme Court considered the issue of whether the Plaintiff's credit application signed by Swan Services Pty Ltd (Swan Services) before 30 January 2012 was a 'transitional security agreement' within the meaning of that term in the Personal Property Securities Act 2009&nbsp

    Filed under:
    Australia, Victoria, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Victoria Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Peter Lucarelli , Heather Sandell
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Execution of mortgage over real property in exchange for full discharge of director's unrelated liabilities held to be voidable as an unreasonable director-related transaction
    2014-02-26

    The Victorian Court of Appeal recently held that a payment, disposition or grant of security by a company to a person on behalf of, or for the benefit of a director of the company, extends to a mortgage of land given by the company to a creditor of the director in consideration of a covenant by the creditor not to sue the director. 

    As a result, insolvency practitioners now have stronger judicial guidance as to what constitutes a 'benefit' for the purposes of setting aside or varying voidable transactions, which should assist in recovering proceeds for unsecured creditors.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Victoria, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Baker McKenzie, Mortgage loan
    Authors:
    Peter Lucarelli
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Personal Property Securities Act: final chance to preserve priority of transitional security interests
    2014-01-10

    The two year transitional period under the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (PPSA) ends on 31 January 2014.  After this date, any remaining transitional security interests (TSIs) that have not been registered on the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR) will no longer have their pre-PPSA priority, which could result in a secured party losing priority to other secured creditors or losing its interest in the secured property altogether if the grantor becomes bankrupt (if an individual) or is placed into administration or liquidation (if a company).

    Filed under:
    Australia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Baker McKenzie, Personal property, Title retention clause
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    First major PPSA decision - perfection is key!
    2013-07-02

    Dispute is one of priority, not ownership.

    The first judgment regarding a major Personal Property Securities Act ("PPSA") priority dispute between a bank with a perfected "General Security Agreement" and an equipment owner with an unperfected "PPS Lease" has been handed down.

    The decision in Richard Albarran and Blair Alexander Pleash as receivers and managers of Maiden Civil (P&E) Pty Ltd & Ors v Queensland Excavation Services Pty Ltd & Ors  highlights three key issues for the insolvency industry:

    Filed under:
    Australia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie
    Authors:
    Maria O'Brien , David Walter , Heather Sandell
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Time extensions for voidable transaction proceedings, and the commissioner for taxation
    2013-06-21

    The importance of notifications to potential defendants and directors of the insolvent company

    The decision in Re Octaviar Administration Pty Ltd (in liq) [2013] NSWSC 786 highlights two key issues for insolvency practitioners:

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Liquidation
    Authors:
    David Walter , John Anderson
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Inquiry into construction industry insolvency
    2012-08-28

    Why the Inquiry?

    The NSW Government has announced an independent Inquiry into Construction Industry Insolvency in NSW.  Announced by NSW Minister for Finance & Services the Hon. Greg Pearce, the Inquiry will examine the extent and causes of insolvency in the NSW construction industry and what reforms are needed to minimise the adverse effects of insolvency on sub-contractors.

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Baker McKenzie
    Authors:
    Alex Hartmann
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Bell appeal judgment delivered
    2012-08-17

    The Western Australian Court of Appeal has today delivered its judgment in the appeal of Westpac Banking Corporation v The Bell Group Ltd (in Liq) [2012] WASCA 157 ( The Bell Appeal ).  The Court substantially rejected the appeal.  The decision has important implications for directors, financiers and bondholder investors. It is a salutary reminder for financiers of the consequences of "knowingly receiving" a benefit from a breach of directors' duties. 

    Background

    Filed under:
    Australia, Western Australia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Bond (finance), Security (finance), Fiduciary
    Authors:
    Maria O'Brien
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Insolvency Law Reform Act: update
    2016-08-24

    Baker & McKenzie Alert Client Alert 24 AUGUST 2016 Download Forward Contact Us Visit Our Website Insolvency Law Reform Act: update The Hon Kelly O'Dwyer MP, the Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, announced yesterday that the Insolvency Law Reform Act 2016 (Cth) (ILRA), which was set to commence on 1 March 2017, will now commence in two stages as follows: • Stage 1 on 1 March 2017; and • Stage 2 on 1 September 2017.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Baker McKenzie, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 388
    • Page 389
    • Page 390
    • Page 391
    • Current page 392
    • Page 393
    • Page 394
    • Page 395
    • Page 396
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days