Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    No priority for Commissioner in company liquidations through the issue of section 260-5 notices
    2009-08-28

    The High Court has further clarified the law regarding the effect of section 260-5 notices served by the Commissioner on third parties who are required to make payments to a company in liquidation.

    The effect of the decision is that the Commissioner cannot issue such a notice after a company has gone into liquidation in order to give himself a priority over other creditors for payment of a tax debt. Such a notice is void.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Piper Alderman, Debt, Liquidation, Court costs, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Australia), Trustee
    Authors:
    Alan Jessup
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Piper Alderman
    Tenant in trouble? What you can do
    2009-09-01

    The different types of insolvency

    When a corporate tenant becomes insolvent, the landlord's rights depend upon the type of insolvency administration to which the tenant is subjected. Being familiar with the different options and the ways in which they are administered will enable property owners to act early and put themselves in the best possible position when faced with an insolvent (or potentially insolvent) tenant.

    The three most common forms of insolvency administration which may affect corporate tenants are discussed below.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Hall & Wilcox, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Discrimination, Board of directors, Debt, Deed, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Liquidator (law), Prejudice, Debenture, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Hall & Wilcox
    Uk House of Lords’ ruling assists foreign liquidators
    2008-04-10

    In a closely-watched case stemming from the demise of the Australian HIH insurance group, the UK House of Lords has ruled in McGrath & Anor & Others v Riddell and Others [2008] UKHL 21 that the English assets of four companies in that group, which are in liquidation in Australia and in ancillary insolvency proceedings in England, must be remitted to Australia for distribution under Australian insolvency law.

    Filed under:
    Australia, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Locke Lord LLP, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), House of Lords
    Location:
    Australia, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Locke Lord LLP
    Clearing the air: Australia's High Court clarifies the operation of the IATA Clearing House Regulations during member airline's Australian insolvency proceeding
    2008-04-22

    If an international airline that is a member of the International Air Transport Association (“IATA”) goes into insolvent external administration under the Australian Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the “Act”), will the IATA Clearing House Regulations (effective January 1, 2006) (the “CH Regulations”) continue to govern the relationship between IATA, the insolvent airline, and the other members of IATA? A recent judgment of Australia’s High Court clarifies these issues.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Aviation, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), High Court of Australia
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    To remit or not to remit – part 3
    2008-04-28

    The House of Lords has ruled that English assets of the HIH group of companies are to be remitted to the Australian liquidators for distribution under Australian law. This briefing discusses the background to McGrath and another and others v Riddell and others [2008] UKHL 21 and the implications of the ruling.

    Background

    The House of Lords recently had to consider whether the English court should remit assets when faced with a request to do so by a foreign court.

    Filed under:
    Australia, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Dividends, Liquidation, Remand (court procedure), Comity, Liquidator (law), House of Lords
    Location:
    Australia, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    Transfer of reinsurance assets abroad
    2008-05-21

    MCGRATH AND ANOTHER v RIDDELL, House of Lords, 9 April 2008

    The liquidators of the HIH group of Australian insurance companies appealed against the decisions of the High Court and the Court of Appeal that certain assets of the HIH group, mostly reinsurance claims on policies taken out in the London market, should not be remitted to Australia. The courts instead ordered that the assets should remain in England and be distributed to creditors in accordance with English insolvency laws.

    Filed under:
    Australia, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Mills & Reeve LLP, Liability (financial accounting), Reinsurance, Liquidation, Remand (court procedure), Common law, Liquidator (law), Prejudice, House of Lords, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Location:
    Australia, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mills & Reeve LLP
    English reinsurance assets to be remitted to Australian liquidators, but for what reason?
    2009-01-08

    In a July 12, 2007 post, we reported on issues relating to HIH Casualty and General Insurance Limited (“HIH”). The question before the court was whether it had jurisdiction to entertain a request under the Insolvency Act for directions to the liquidators in England to transfer assets collected by them to the liquidators in an Australian liquidation. The Court of Appeal held that it would not direct a transfer of the English assets by the English provisional liquidators to the Australian liquidators because to do so would prejudice the interests of many of the creditors.

    Filed under:
    Australia, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Jorden Burt LLP, Conflict of laws, Discrimination, Reinsurance, Liquidation, Remand (court procedure), Common law, Liquidator (law), House of Lords, Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Location:
    Australia, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Jorden Burt LLP
    Federal government proposes national personal property securities law
    2009-06-30

    Attorney-General Robert McClelland, has today introduced a bill in Federal Parliament to create a comprehensive national personal property securities law, to be known as the Personal Property Securities Act (PPSA). The bill is the culmination of more than three years of public consultation and is a significantly revised version of an exposure draft bill that was the subject of a report by the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs in March of this year.  

    Filed under:
    Australia, Asset Finance, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Piper Alderman, Security (finance), Public consultations, Accounts receivable, Interest, Personal property, Intangible asset, Title retention clause, US Federal Government
    Authors:
    Michael Lhuede , Mark Gordon
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Piper Alderman
    US District Court upholds safe harbour protection of swap agreements from ipso facto prohibitions - lessons for Australia
    2018-04-12

    In June 2016, Judge Chapman of the US Bankruptcy Court handed down a landmark decision in In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc., 553 B.R. 476 (Bankr S.D.N.Y.

    Filed under:
    Australia, USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clayton Utz, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Karen O'Flynn , Flora Innes
    Location:
    Australia, USA
    Firm:
    Clayton Utz
    Linc Energy convicted of causing serious environmental harm but avoids liability under Environmental Protection Order
    2018-04-13

    On 9 April 2018 Linc Energy Ltd (in liquidation) was convicted of causing serious environmental harm at its pilot underground coal gasification facility near Chinchilla, Queensland.

    Administrators were appointed to the company on 15 April 2016. On 23 May they were appointed liquidators after creditors resolved that the company be wound up.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Queensland, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Projects & Procurement, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Henry Prokuda
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 139
    • Page 140
    • Page 141
    • Page 142
    • Current page 143
    • Page 144
    • Page 145
    • Page 146
    • Page 147
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days