Chart Comparing Exemptions
The specific bankruptcy and nonbankruptcy (Minnesota law and nonbankruptcy federal law) exemptions vary in scope and dollar amount. The following table summarizes and compares the two sets of exemptions. The statutory language of the exemption has been paraphrased in this chart. The actual statutory language as well as case law must be reviewed when analyzing a debtor’s claim for a particular exemption.
Revised August 2024
On September 13, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware issued a highly anticipated decision in the In re: Yellow Corporation, et al. bankruptcy that addressed objections to 11 multiemployer pension funds’ withdrawal liability claims totaling $6.5 billion, where those plans received billions in taxpayer-funded Special Financial Assistance (SFA) provided under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) that was not included in plan assets for purposes of the withdrawal liability assessments based upon PBGC regulations.
In this article we address a significant change in Portuguese legislation: Decree-Law no. 48/2024 of 25 July, which brought a new dynamic to the prevalence of the right of retention over the mortgage. This topic is crucial to understanding the implications for the current legal framework, especially in cases of insolvency and company rescue.
En este artículo abordamos un cambio significativo en la legislación portuguesa: el Decreto-Ley nº 48/2024, de 25 de julio, que aportó una nueva dinámica a la prevalencia del derecho de retención sobre la hipoteca. Este tema es crucial para comprender las implicaciones en el marco jurídico actual, especialmente en los casos de insolvencia y rescate de empresas.
Restructuring Plans: should an opposing creditor be granted security for costs? Might that open the floodgates where companies are by definition “distressed,” or was this particular Plan more akin to ordinary adversarial litigation? Read our summary below.
We have a direct statutory conflict:
- one statute requires an ERISA dispute to be resolved in arbitration; but
- a bankruptcy statute requires the same dispute to be resolved in bankruptcy.
Which statute should prevail? The bankruptcy statute, of course.
- That’s the conclusion of In re Yellow Corp.[Fn. 1]
Statutory Conflict
The In re Yellow Corp. case presents a direct conflict between these two federal statutes (emphases added):
In a recent judgment1, the High Court determined (contrary to the arguments of the affected secured creditor) that a debenture created a floating charge rather than a fixed charge over certain internet protocol (IP) addresses. Whilst elements of the decision are inevitably fact-specific, some broader lessons and reminders can be taken from the judgment which will be of general relevance to lenders when taking security.
Determining a foreign debtor's "center of main interests" ("COMI") for purposes of recognizing a foreign bankruptcy proceeding in the United States under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code can be problematic in cases involving multiple debtors that are members of an enterprise group doing business in several different countries. The U.S.
As empresas portuguesas que registem paragens na produção, por motivos de reestruturação da organização produtiva, podem candidatar-se a um apoio financeiro aos custos suportados com formação e encargos salariais.
A Portaria n.º 367/2024 de 29 de fevereiro criou o programa “Qualifica On” que permite aos empregadores portugueses obter um incentivo financeiro pelos custos suportados com formação dos seus trabalhadores e com encargos salariais (remuneração, contribuições sociais e subsídio de alimentação).
The presentation of the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law (COM/2022/702) marks a significant step towards the convergence of fundamental aspects of insolvency law throughout the EU, which is considered fundamental if cross-border investment and cross-border business relationships are to reach their potential.