As from 1 May 2018, the Belgian insolvency landscape will look different following the entry into force of the brand new Insolvency Law (Book XX of the Economic Law Code). In the wake of the electronic debt reporting system that came into force on 1 April 2017, the filing of bankruptcy must also be made electronically in the Central Solvency Register (RegSol) as of 1 May 2018.
Vanaf 1 mei 2018 ziet het Belgische insolventielandschap er anders uit ingevolge de inwerkingtreding van het gloednieuwe insolventierecht (Boek XX in het Wetboek Economisch Recht). In navolging van de elektronische aangifte van schuldvordering sinds 1 april 2017, dient vanaf 1 mei 2018 ook de aangifte van faillissement elektronisch te gebeuren in het Centraal Register Solvabiliteit (Regsol).
L’entrée en vigueur de la toute nouvelle loi sur l’insolvabilité modifiera le paysage du droit de l’insolvabilité belge dès à partir du 1er mai 2018. Le 1er avril 2017 entrait en vigueur le système de déclaration de créance par voie électronique. A présent, entrera en vigueur, dès ce 1er mai 2018, la demande de faillite par voie électronique dans le Registre Central de la Solvabilité.
1. It is hard to get rid of this preconceived idea that unlike other systems, the French insolvency system (excessively) favours debtors at the expense of their creditors.
Some recent decisions make it possible to question this idea.
These decisions deal with the conditions required for the approval of a safeguard plan and are warnings to debtors that might be tempted to force their plan through.
Safeguard proceedings end with the court-approval of a restructuring plan when there are serious chances of rescuing the business (French Commercial Code, Art. L.626-1).
Sellers and suppliers of movable assets can deal with problems caused by poorly-paying customers through a retention of title clause. This clause makes it contractually possible to stipulate that ownership of a certain good does not transfer until the third party acquirer has paid the full price.
It is interesting to note that the new Law on Pledges has created a better legal framework for the retention of title clause, putting any creditor - assuming a retention of title clause has been included - in a stronger position.
The law of 11 August 2017 that adds Book XX "Insolvency of Enterprises" into the Code of Economic Law enters into force on 1 May 2018.
As we already stated in our previous contributions about the reform of the insolvency law, this law modifies and regroups the Bankruptcy law and the Law of 31 January 2009 on the Continuity of Enterprises.
1. The notion "Enterprise" replaces the notion "Merchant"
Do you know the new rules?
The alarming increase in "speculative mergers" and the increasingly frequent occurrence of strawmen in commercial companies' management structures has long been seen as a major obstacle on the Slovak market. In response, the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic has amended the Commercial Code to support and encourage business in Slovakia.
Below we summarise the key changes that affect all business entities, not only with respect to mergers, but also in other areas of day-to-day commercial activity in Slovakia.
If you've ever traded with a company that subsequently enters liquidation, you'll know that it can be very frustrating and disruptive to your business. If the company owes you money and you're an unsecured creditor, you'll join the (often long) line of other unsecured creditors and may see little or no money at the end of the process.
On 13 July 2017 parliament voted to introduce book XX "Insolvency of Companies" in the Code of Economic Law.
In a previous article we already wrote that the insolvency law would be adapted to current national and international regulations and case law and would be incorporated into the Code of Economic Law as a coherent whole.
In this way, solvency procedures must be more transparent, efficient and effective.
In an appeal against an order refusing a worldwide freezing order on the basis that the applicant could not show assets somewhere in the world, Lord Justice Longmore has confirmed that it is not enough for an applicant to assert that the respondent was apparently wealthy and must have assets somewhere.