In certain sectors, in particular in technology and life sciences, it is common for companies to combine forces in order to maximise business opportunities. Only rarely can a single company undertake every aspect of (for example) invention, development and exploitation by itself. A company may decide to contract out such activities, or to collaborate with a third party with different skills or resources. Such a collaboration may take the form of a joint venture.

SU M M ER 2 02 1 | I F LR .C O M | 1 T he Hong Kong Companies Court has made a number of rulings concerning mainland Chinese corporate groups listed in Hong Kong SAR which illustrate the evolving landscape of cross-border insolvency law.These cases may, in some instances, cause creditors and debtors to re-evaluate some of the enforcement and defensive strategies traditionally used in the insolvencies of such companies.

1 Contact Information If you have any questions concerning this update, please contact: Naomi Moore Partner [email protected] Hong Kong +852 3694.3050 Abid Qureshi Partner [email protected] New York +1 212.872.8027 Liz Osborne Partner

经营本地业务之香港注册公司的清盘呈请个案现时占少数。此外，我每周都会收到一些在离岸司法管辖区注册成立并且在本地上市的公司的“温和”临时清盘人在申请认可和协助时拟采用 Z-Obee 一案的技巧…”

--- 夏利士法官（中国汇源果汁集团有限公司案 [2020]HKCFI 2940 at [55]）（裁决日期：2020 年 11 月 19 日）

跨境破产在香港日益活跃。以上引述的一段话说明了香港公司法院原讼法庭处理的清盘和破产程序案件很大部分源于申请承认及向外国清盘人提供协助。

早前发布的客户简报（原文见此处）探讨了向香港法院申请将外国公司强制清盘的问题。本客户简报考虑另一个问题， 就是香港法院对该外国公司注册成立的司法管辖区所发出的清盘令可以给予的承认和协助。

一般原则 香港並非《联合国国际贸易法委员会国际商事仲裁示范法》(UNCITRAL Model Law)的签署方，也没有制定该法例。承认和协助外国破产程序的权力源自普通法。

以下为典型的事实例子：一家无力偿债的公司在香港境外（通常为热门的离岸司法管辖区）注册成立但其资产位于香港。该公司的海外注册地批准就清盘呈请颁布清盘令，并任命临时清盘人。临时清盘人随后向香港法院申请“承认”该海外命令，使该清盘令通过香港法院授予的“协助”在香港具有域外适用性。

“Since the court resumed hearings in May [2020] more than half the petitions I have heard have involved listed companies. Remarkably petitions to wind-up Hong Kong incorporated companies operating domestic businesses are currently a minority. In addition I have received weekly applications for recognition and assistance by soft-touch provisional liquidators of companies incorporated in one of the offshore jurisdictions and listed here intending to use the Z-Obee technique …”

In the groundbreaking recent decision in Re Samson Paper Company Limited (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) [2021] HKCFI 2151 (“Samson”), the Hong Kong Companies Court (the “Hong Kong court”) has for the first time issued a letter of request to a court in mainland China under the new cross-border mutual recognition, assistance and cooperation arrangement between Hong Kong and mainland China (the “Mainland”) in relation to corporate insolvency and restructuring matters (the “Cooperation Arrangement”), which took effect on May 14, 2021.

Beginning on February 13, 2021, something unprecedented happened in the state of Texas—a winter storm caused temperatures to dip well-below freezing. This event, dubbed the “Black Swan Winter Event,” caused Texas to experience a catastrophic energy crisis. As demand for energy soared, supply plummeted as power plants tripped offline and natural gas supply lines froze. The storm raged on, and on February 16, the Public Utility Commission of Texas (“PUCT”), which oversees the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc.

Sounds like an odd combination—enforceability of make-whole and post-petition interest and patent law. It is. But relevant nonetheless. Recall that a key argument in the ongoing Ultra Petroleum dispute regarding the noteholders’ entitlement to make-whole and post-petition interest is the existence of the Solvent Debtor Rule. The Solvent Debtor Rule is a judicially created exception to the prohibition on claims for post-petition interest by unsecured creditors in bankruptcy.

This client briefing discusses a Court of Final Appeal’s decision concerning the application of section 182 of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance.

Responses to the HM Treasury call for evidence on the Review of Solvency II

On 1 July HM Treasury published a summary of the responses received to its autumn 2020 call for evidence on the Review of Solvency II.

HM Treasury comments