Fulltext Search
District Court dismisses insider preference claim despite affiliates holding equity and board seats

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed an insider preference complaint by Capmark Financial Group Inc. and its affiliates ("Capmark") seeking to recover a $145 million pre-bankruptcy payment from a lender group. Capmark Financial Group Inc. v. Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., __ F. Supp. 2d __, 2013 WL 1420243 (S.D.N.Y. Apr.

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Board of directors, Limited liability company, Ally Financial, Second Circuit, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
PIF revisited - no right not to be diluted

On 5 October 2011 Justice Barrett of the Supreme Court of NSW handed down a decision in Centro Retail Limited and Centro MCS Manager Limited in its capacity as Responsible Entity of the Centro Retail Trust [2011] NSWSC 1175 (“Centro”) where he found that the responsible entity of Centro Retail Trust would be justified in modifying the constitution of the trust without unitholder approval to a insert a provision permitting the issue of units at a price different to that provided for by the pre-existing provisions.

Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons, Retail, Security (finance), Investment funds, Market value, Net asset value, Unilateralism, Australian Securities Exchange, ING Group, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, Constitutional amendment, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Constitution, Federal Court of Australia, New South Wales Supreme Court