Fulltext Search
Liquidator’s default judgment dismissed to avoid risk of inconsistent findings

In the matter of Bleecker Property Group Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) [2023] NSWSC 1071, appears to be the first published case that considers the question of whether an order can be made under section 588FF(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by way of default judgment against one defendant where there are multiple defendants in the proceedings.

Key takeaways

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Liquidation, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Court grants limited intervention in Liquidator’s funding approval applications

This week’s TGIF considers Hundy (liquidator), in the matter of 3 Property Group 13 Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2022] FCA 1216, in which the Federal Court of Australia granted leave under rule 2.13(1) of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) (FCCR) for intervening parties to be h

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Federal Court of Australia
ABI Commission proposes changes to Bankruptcy Code safe harbors

Changes may be coming to the Bankruptcy Code’s safe harbor provisions.[1] In 2012 the American Bankruptcy Institute established a Commission to Study the Reform of Chapter 11 (the “ABI Commission”), composed of many well-respected restructuring practitioners, including two of the original drafters of the Bankruptcy Code, whose advice holds great weight in the restructuring community.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Alston & Bird LLP, Security (finance), Safe harbor (law), Mortgage-backed security, Title 11 of the US Code
TOUSA redux: the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirms bankruptcy court’s avoidance of constructively fraudulent transfers and reverses the district court

The outcome of the TOUSA appeal has been much anticipated and closely watched by the lending community, their counsel and advisors, and legal scholars. On May 15, 2012, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion (found here), reversing the District Court for the Southern District of Florida and affirming the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, at least insofar as to the bankruptcy court’s factual findings, but not remedies.

USA, Florida, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Bankruptcy, Subsidiary, United States bankruptcy court, Eleventh Circuit
Court holds that a bankruptcy termination provision that subordinates an in-the-money debtor’s right to a distribution may be an unenforceable ipso facto provision

In Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. v. Ballyrock ABS CDO 2007-1 Limited (In re Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.), Adv. P. No. 09-01032 (JMP) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2011) [hereinafter “Ballyrock”], the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that a contractual provision that subordinates the priority of a termination payment owing under a credit default swap (CDS) to a debtor in bankruptcy, and which caps the amount of the termination payment, may be an unenforceable ipso facto clause under section 541(c)(1)(B).

USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Injunction, Statutory interpretation, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Credit default swap, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York