Fulltext Search
Gogetta security, but no priority: The importance of a lender’s conduct in determining who has the better equity

This week’s TGIF considers Gogetta Equipment Funding Pty Ltd v Mark & Liz Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 91, which examined a priority contest between competing equitable interests in property.

What happened?

Australia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Left in the dark - Seeking to appoint a voluntary administrator when Board relations crumble

This week’s TGIF considers the case ofIn the matter of Bean and Sprout Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 351, an application seeking a declaration as to the validity of the appointment of a voluntary administrator.

What happened?

On 7 December 2018, Mr Kong Yao Chin (Chin) was purportedly appointed as the voluntary administrator of Bean and Sprout Pty Ltd (Company) by a resolution of the Company.

Australia, New South Wales, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Board of directors, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), New South Wales Supreme Court
Re Run of Re Amerind - Part 2: Circulating Security Interests and Circulating Assets

This week’s TGIF is the second of a two-part series considering Commonwealth v Byrnes [2018] VSCA 41, the Victorian Court of Appeal’s decision on appeal from last year’s Re Amerind decision about the insolvency of corporate trustees.

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Has new NSW insurance legislation created more problems than it has solved for claimants, creditors and insolvency practitioners?

In June 2017, the New South Wales Parliament introduced the Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW Act), designed to clarify the rights of claimants to proceed directly against insurance companies. But in the context of insolvent corporations, has it created more problems than it has solved?

Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Supreme Court holds that free and clear sale plan cannot be confirmed without preserving secured creditor’s credit bidding rights

On May 29, 2012, the Supreme Court in In RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC (“RadLAX”) held that a Chapter 11 reorganization plan that proposes the sale of encumbered assets free and clear of liens must honor the secured creditor’s right to credit bid its claim in order to be confirmed under the “fair and equitable” standard of the Bankruptcy Code.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Secured creditor, Secured loan
Third Circuit rules that plan of reorganization proposing a sale of assets free and clear of liens need not allow secured lenders to credit bid at the sale

In a recent split decision, a 2-1 majority for the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that a debtor’s plan of reorganization that proposes a sale of assets free and clear of liens is not necessarily required to allow creditors whose loans are secured by those assets to credit bid at the sale. The majority decision in In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC, Nos. 09-4266, 09-4349, 2010 WL 1006647 (3d Cir. Mar. 22, 2010), which follows a similar decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (see Bank of N.Y. Trust Co., NA v.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Federal Reporter, Debt, Personal property, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Third Circuit