Fulltext Search
Singapore unveils major debt restructuring law reforms

Singapore’s Ministry of Law has unveiled significant proposed changes aimed at revising Singapore’s restructuring and insolvency laws and developing Singapore into a regional debt restructuring hub.1

IN BRIEF

Draft legislation unveiled

Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Debt restructuring
Recognition of foreign insolvencies at common law: Singapore sets COMI precedent

In Brief

For the first time, a court has adopted the ‘centre of main interest’ (COMI) as grounds at common law to recognise foreign insolvency proceedings.

The decision earlier this year by the High Court of Singapore (the Court) recognised a Japanese bankruptcy trustee appointed to companies incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (BVI):

Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Liquidation, Common law, UNCITRAL, Singapore High Court
Australia's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law Reform: ipso facto clauses

Major insolvency reform: Getting the (ipso) factos straight

In brief

Australia, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Bankruptcy
Australia's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law Reform: Safe harbour

In brief

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Bankruptcy
Australian Government forges ahead with major insolvency law reform

On 29 April 2016, the Australian Federal Government (Government) announced three major insolvency law reform proposals in its Improving Bankruptcy and Insolvency Laws Proposal Paper1 (Proposal). The Government has invited submissions from stakeholders and given this is a rare opportunity to undertake substantial reform, we strongly encourage involvement. 

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Stakeholder (corporate)
The Statute of Limitations For A Preference Claim

Because no recent opinions have been published by the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, I wanted to touch on a subject that is vital in nearly every preference or fraudulent transfer case: The Statute of Limitations For A Preference Claim

A. Statute of Limitations

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Statute of limitations, United States bankruptcy court
Sanctions? In Delaware Bankruptcy Court? Yes

– But they weren’t as oppressive as my subject line may imply.

In a 13 page decision, released April 22, 2016, Judge Gross of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court granted a motion to dismiss an adversary proceeding and sanctioned the Plaintiff – disallowing any further litigation against the defendants in the Bankruptcy Court. Judge Gross’ opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, United States bankruptcy court
Decision in ultimate acquisition grants motion to dismiss, but also grants leave to amend the preference complaint

Summary

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy
Ruling confirms that judicial liens are dischargeable in Chapter 7

Summary

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Debt, Personal property, United States bankruptcy court
Consistency - a hallmark of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court

In a 17 page decision entered March 9, 2012, Judge Carey of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court granted a motion for relief from the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay to allow an undersecured creditor to exercise its remedies against a debtor’s collateral.  A copy of Judge Carey's opinion is available here (the "Opinion").  The Opinion was issued in a case nearly identical to that discussed in this post:

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, United States bankruptcy court