Fulltext Search
Singapore unveils major debt restructuring law reforms

Singapore’s Ministry of Law has unveiled significant proposed changes aimed at revising Singapore’s restructuring and insolvency laws and developing Singapore into a regional debt restructuring hub.1

IN BRIEF

Draft legislation unveiled

Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Debt restructuring
Recognition of foreign insolvencies at common law: Singapore sets COMI precedent

In Brief

For the first time, a court has adopted the ‘centre of main interest’ (COMI) as grounds at common law to recognise foreign insolvency proceedings.

The decision earlier this year by the High Court of Singapore (the Court) recognised a Japanese bankruptcy trustee appointed to companies incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (BVI):

Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Liquidation, Common law, UNCITRAL, Singapore High Court
Australia's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law Reform: ipso facto clauses

Major insolvency reform: Getting the (ipso) factos straight

In brief

Australia, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Bankruptcy
Australia's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law Reform: Safe harbour

In brief

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Bankruptcy
Australian Government forges ahead with major insolvency law reform

On 29 April 2016, the Australian Federal Government (Government) announced three major insolvency law reform proposals in its Improving Bankruptcy and Insolvency Laws Proposal Paper1 (Proposal). The Government has invited submissions from stakeholders and given this is a rare opportunity to undertake substantial reform, we strongly encourage involvement. 

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Stakeholder (corporate)
For Bankruptcy Purposes, the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Asks: When is a Tax Return Not a Tax Return? — Then Provides An Answer Different From Other Circuits’

Court of Appeals Rejects Literal Construction of Bankruptcy Code section 523(a)(1), Ruling Court Must Determine Whether Debtors Subjectively Made an Honest and Reasonable Attempt to Satisfy the Tax Law

In a December 17, 2015 decision in United States v. Martin (In re Martin), 2015 WL 9252590 (9th Cir. BAP 2015) the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Panel”), defined what qualifies as a tax return for dischargeability purposes, specifically disagreeing with three other Courts of Appeals.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Paul Hastings LLP, Ninth Circuit, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel