Fulltext Search
IBC: Resolution Plan Involving ‘Combination’ Must Clear CCI Hurdle First

The legal framework w.r.t. law of insolvency in India has seen considerable progress since the introduction of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”). The Legislature, taking cue from various judgments passed by the courts and the grey areas identified during the implementation of the provisions of IBC, introduced various amendments from time to time. However, notwithstanding such amendments, various legal questions involving interpretation and implementation of provisions of IBC keep arising posing challenges before the Courts to resolve the same.

India, Competition & Antitrust, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Singhania & Partners LLP, Competition Commission of India, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
Whether the limitation to file an appeal under IBC will commence on the date of pronouncement of order or from the date when contents are known to the aggrieved party?

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (New Delhi Bench) (“NCLAT”) in two recent judgments passed in Raiyan Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Unrivalled Projects Pvt. Ltd. [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1071 of 2023] and Aryan Mining & Trading Corpn Pvt. Ltd. vs Kail limited and Anr. [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.

India, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Singhania & Partners LLP, Insolvency, Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
Whether the limitation to file an appeal under IBC will commence on the date of pronouncement of order or from the date when contents are known to the aggrieved party?

INTRODUCTION: 

India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Singhania & Partners LLP, Insolvency, Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
Good things take time: Parliamentary Joint Committee delivers report on Australia’s corporate insolvency framework

The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (the Committee) has delivered its report following an inquiry into the “effectiveness of Australia’s corporate insolvency laws in protecting and maximising value for the benefit of all interested parties and the economy”.

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Insolvency, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Past its peak: the High Court of Australia confirms the abolition of the peak indebtedness rule for unfair preferences

In the much-anticipated decision of Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 2 (Badenoch (HCA)), the High Court of Australia (the HCA) has now confirmed that the peak indebtedness rule may not be used when assessing the quantum of an unfair preference claim arising from a continuing business relationship.

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trade & Customs, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
First decision on Australia’s ipso facto stay in voluntary administration

The Federal Court of Australia (Court) has handed down the first reported decision on the ipso facto stay provisions contained in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act).

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Atlas shrugged: the limits of an administrator’s lien over secured property

Chief Justice Hammerschlag, sitting in the New South Wales Supreme Court (the Court), has delivered a judgement of importance to secured creditor and insolvency practitioners alike in Volkswagen Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd v Atlas CTL Pty Ltd (Recs and Mngrs Apptd) (In liq) [2022] NSWSC 573 (Atlas).

Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Insolvency, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), New South Wales Supreme Court
Parliamentary inquiry into corporate insolvency in Australia

The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (the Committee) has commenced an inquiry into the “effectiveness of Australia’s corporate insolvency laws in protecting and maximising value for the benefit of all interested parties and the economy”.[1]

Australia, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Coronavirus, Insolvency, Australian Taxation Office, Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Australia), Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
Hong Kong Court of Appeal considers the effect of exclusive jurisdiction clause on bankruptcy proceedings

A recent Hong Kong Court of Appeal decision examined a creditor’s right to commence bankruptcy/insolvency proceedings where the petition debt arises from an agreement containing an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of a foreign court: Guy Kwok-Hung Lam v Tor Asia Credit Master Fund LP [2022] HKCA 1297.

Hong Kong, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
Sending disclaimer to the sawmill: A liquidator’s power to disclaim land subject to environmental liabilities following the Australian Sawmilling case

In The Australian Sawmilling Company Pty Ltd (in liq) v Environment Protection Authority [2021] VSCA 294 (Australian Sawmilling), the Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal (VSCA) dismissed an appeal by the liquidators of The Australian Sawmilling Company Pty Ltd (TASCO) against a decision of Garde J of the Victorian Supreme Court (VSC) setting aside the liquidators’ disclaimer of land subject to significant environmental ‘clean up’ costs (Primary Judgment).

Australia, Victoria, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Environment Protection Act 2017 (Victoria) (Australia)