Section 550 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that, when a transfer is avoided under one of several other sections of the Code, a trustee may recover “the property transferred, or, if the court so orders, the value of such property” from “the initial transferee of such transfer,” “the entity for whose benefit such transfer was made,” or “any immediate or mediate transferee of such initial transferee.” 11 U.S.C. § 550(a).
A troubled company may use Chapter 11 bankruptcy to restructure its debts or to sell its assets. The assets of a troubled company can often be sold or otherwise liquidated relatively quickly and efficiently in a bankruptcy proceeding and leave far fewer loose ends afterward than most any other sale method.
In our next segment of Bankruptcy Bytes, Liam O’Connor provides an introduction to how creditors can navigate Adversary Proceedings in Bankruptcy Court.
The number of so-called mega-bankruptcies filed during the first half of the year tells only part of the story. The pain is not just at the top, but spreads across multiple sectors of the economy. Overall, business bankruptcy filings are 30% higher than they have been at any time during the last 5 years. And, with attempts to re-start the economy already sputtering, the news during the second half could be worse.
On July 6, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (which covers appeals from federal courts in Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin) handed down the third in a series of decisions related to Chicago debtors seeking chapter 13 bankruptcy protection in order to avoid or defer paying parking and other vehicle fines. The key take away from the decision is that a bankruptcy court may confirm a chapter 13 repayment plan that holds property in the estate, but must make a finding of good, case-specific reasons for doing so.
On May 5, 2020, Judge Mary Walrath of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware delivered a bench ruling that denied a minority shareholder’s motion to dismiss the Chapter 11 cases of Pace Industries and certain of its affiliates on the grounds that the shareholder’s contractual right to block a bankruptcy filing under the debtor’s certificate of incorporation was contrary to public policy.
The COVID-19 pandemic is upending economies globally, causing a wave of unexpected insolvencies. The businesses that remain standing may face the question: will my insolvency or that of my counterparty prevent me from resolving disputes by arbitration?
The short answer is no. However, depending on the jurisdiction, there will be some limitations on what can be decided by arbitration. We have therefore briefly summarized some of the issues and challenges that a party may face under US law in the context of an arbitration arising from its own or an opposing party’s insolvency.
Bankruptcy presents challenges for both landlords and tenants. However, tenants are often better protected during a bankruptcy case. And as some of the first big bankruptcy cases in the COVID-19 era show, protections for tenants could be expanding.
Tenants in bankruptcy have the following shields from lease obligations:
Forgiveness from termination provisions
Termination provisions in a lease cannot be enforced once tenants file for bankruptcy.
Freedom to assume and assign the lease
This post provides a quick primer on the administrative expense claims. These claims are entitled to priority for actual and necessary goods and services supplied to a debtor in bankruptcy. For a claim to qualify for administrative expense status, a debtor must request that the claimant provide goods and services post-petition or induce the claimant to do so. The goods or services must result in a benefit to the bankruptcy estate. And the claimant bears the burden of proof that a claim qualifies for priority treatment under 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(A).
The High Court in London gave judgment on Friday, 3 July 2020 on the relative ranking of over $10 billion of subordinated liabilities in the administrations of two entities in the Lehman Brothers group.