Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code was introduced more than ten years ago to “to provide effective mechanisms for dealing with cases of cross-border insolvency.” It incorporates the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (the “Model Law”) promulgated by the
Technical Knock Out (“TKO”): a boxing term used to describe a situation where one boxer is deemed the winner after knocking the other down three times. In this case, a TKO can also be used to describe a recent ruling by the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.
“Round and around and around and around we go // Oh now tell me, now tell me, now tell me now you know // … It takes me all the way // I want [to extend the automatic] stay” – Rihanna (as modified)
Starting today, you may notice a new look for some of the forms used in bankruptcy cases. Some of the key forms now make a distinction between non-individual bankruptcy cases and business bankruptcy cases. For your convenience, we are attaching some of the key forms used in business bankruptcy cases.
The following are among the changes to the less compact form of petition for business bankruptcies:
Typically, when an individual debtor files for bankruptcy, all of his or her belongings become part of the big “property of the estate” pot that the court ladles up pro rata among hungry creditors. But debtors need to eat too. Exemption law allows individual debtors and their families to keep some basic property, such as the clothes on their backs and roofs over their heads.
An essential element to any cramdown plan is the presence of at least one impaired accepting class. Even when a plan proponent purports to satisfy this requirement, objecting parties will often challenge the plan’s classification scheme or whether a particular class is truly impaired. A recent decision from the Southern District of New York,